CFAH.org

Eight Lessons from the 2016 Election

Going into Election Day 2016, there was little doubt that Donald Trump would do well in blue-collar, economically struggling, southwestern Pennsylvania. But even veteran politicos here were surprised by just how well Trump did.

Consider Joseph DiSarro, a Republican Party official and political scientist at Washington & Jefferson College. A fellow Republican had asked DiSarro if he would volunteer on Election Day at the polling place in Prosperity, a tiny, unincorporated township in Washington County. DiSarro packed up some party literature and drove out there.

When he arrived, he found the polls swelling with voters. It took only 40 minutes before he ran out of literature.

“I couldn’t keep up with people,” DiSarro recalled in an interview at his office in Washington, Pa. “These were hard-working people who repaired machinery or worked on a farm. I was the only one with a suit on.”

In interviews with political professionals in southwestern Pennsylvania a week after the election, we heard many similar stories. In this article — the latest of several dispatches by this author for PoliticsPA from southwestern Pennsylvania since 2009 – we’ll offer a post-mortem on the election, looking at eight questions and answers about the long-term political trends in southwestern Pennsylvania.

The article focuses on five increasingly Republican-leaning counties in southwestern Pennsylvania (Beaver, Fayette, Greene, Washington and Westmoreland) and, to a lesser extent, Allegheny County, which has remained resolutely blue due to a more urban population of Pittsburgh.

1. How badly have Democratic prospects deteriorated in presidential voting in southwestern Pennsylvania?

Observers in the region – Republicans and Democrats alike – acknowledge being surprised that Trump ended up winning Pennsylvania as a whole. (Trump beat Hillary Clinton in Pennsylvania by fewer than 70,000 votes, making it one of the crucial flipped states Trump needed to secure an Electoral College majority.)

However, no one here was surprised that Trump improved on how Mitt Romney performed in the 2012 election.

“When I drove through rural areas in Westmoreland County, it was wall-to-wall Trump signs,” said Marty Marks, a senior communications consultant for the AFL-CIO and Democratic campaigns.

For each of the six counties, we compiled the Democratic presidential candidate’s share of the two-party vote in every presidential election since 2000. In Allegheny County, Democratic strength has remained stable and even climbed modestly in 2016. But in the other five counties, the Democratic candidate’s share of the vote has declined in lockstep.

In 2000, Beaver, Fayette, Greene and Washington all gave Al Gore better than 53 percent of the two-party vote. By 2016, those four supported Clinton by only 29 percent to 40 percent of the two-party vote.

jacobson-1

Meanwhile, the number of raw Republican votes in the six counties has risen in each election since 2000. The collective total GOP presidential vote in the six counties has increased by 51 percent since 2000, and by 14 percent over the 2012 level alone. Between 2012 and 2016, the GOP’s improvement in presidential votes – 32,279 – accounted for nearly half of Trump’s statewide margin over Clinton. 

jacobson-2

2. Are there any signs of life for Democrats in the region further down the ballot?

Hope is largely gone, but not entirely lost.

There are two ways to look at this.

On the one hand, Democratic prospects for state legislative seats in the region have deteriorated in recent election cycles.

This year, in the race for the open, Democratic-held 49th state House district seat, which includes portions of Fayette and Washington County, Republican Bud Cook defeated Democrat Alan Benyak, 54 percent-46 percent.

And in the 51st House district, which includes portions of Fayette and Somerset County, Democratic incumbent Timothy Mahoney was unseated by Republican challenger Matthew Dowling, 53 percent-47 percent.

One bright spot for Democrats was Pam Snyder, the incumbent in the 50th House district, which includes portions of Fayette, Green and Washington counties. Despite the Trump wave in her district, Snyder prevailed, 53 percent-47 percent, against Republican challenger Betsy Rohanna McClure.

Republicans “threw everything they had at Snyder, and she did not go negative,” said Kirk Holman, a longtime political observer and onetime Republican official in California, Pa. “She was everywhere and she won.”

There’s another way to look at it, and it’s more favorable to the Democrats. Democrats on the statewide ballot whose names were not “Hillary Clinton” did substantially better than Clinton did in southwestern Pennsylvania, as the following chart shows.

Senate candidate Katie McGinty lost statewide, but she did 4.12 percentage points better than Clinton did in Beaver, Fayette, Greene, Washington and Westmoreland counties.

Other Democratic candidates did even better in the region.

Attorney general candidate Josh Shapiro, who won statewide, did 10.4 percentage points better than Clinton in the five counties. Two other statewide Democratic winners also far outpaced Clinton’s performance in the five counties – Joe Torsella (who did 11.86 points better than Clinton) and Eugene DePasquale (who did 12.58 points better than Clinton).

Torsella and DePasquale actually won Beaver County, and they came close in a few of the other counties.

jacobson-3

“Trump was a unique candidate, and Clinton was unique with her issues,” said Mike Mikus, a longtime Democratic strategist based in southwestern Pennsylvania, most recently for McGinty. “It was a perfect storm where people wanted an outsider.”

3. What factors pushed Trump to unprecedented success in the region?

Trump owes his strong showing in the region to a combination of substance and style, observers here said.

Trump’s focus on economic issues clearly touched a nerve. Coal miners in the region “know people in Houston and Detroit, and they talked, and in the end, the Trump movement was born,” said DiSarro, the GOP official. “It had its genesis from economic dissatisfaction.”

By contrast, DiSarro said, Clinton’s warnings about Trump’s potential for a dangerous foreign policy fell flat here. DiSarro said he’s met people who have advanced degrees but have been working at Starbucks for more than a year.

“Voters here were concerned with whether they can make a reasonable living, and whether their children will have opportunities,” he said. “He projected an image of change with respect to the status quo in our economic system.”

Trump also won residents over on style points.

“He was like a cheerleader at a pep rally,” said Lawrence Maggi, a Democratic commissioner in Washington County and former congressional candidate. “He made people feel good.”

Jon Delano, the money and politics editor for KDKA-TV in Pittsburgh, said he sensed this at every Trump rally he attended in the region.

“His supporters were passionate, they clearly disliked (President Barack) Obama and wanted change, and they felt they had been ridiculed and saw their concerns ignored,” Delano said.

Trump, DiSarro said, “was at least giving hope. Clinton didn’t give any hope.”

4. What difficult lessons can Democrats learn from the results?

We heard at least three lessons.

The first was Clinton’s lack of emphasis on energy development, which proved to be deadly in southwestern Pennsylvania.

“The biggest economic driver here is energy development,” said Mike Butler, a veteran Democratic strategist in the region who is executive director of the Consumer Energy Alliance-Mid Atlantic. “A large part of the Democratic Party seemed hostile to it. How do we get back those voters? We’re not talking to them.”

Mike Ward, a GOP strategist in southwestern Pennsylvania, added that it will be tough for Democrats, since many Democrats statewide and nationally favor environmental restrictions rather than expanding fracking and coal mining.

The problem, he said, is that “you can’t win Appalachia without being pro-gas and pro-coal. You can’t.”

Second, the Democratic focus on income inequality didn’t resonate here. The Republican focus on economic stagnation did.

“Inequality means pitting neighbor against neighbor, and I don’t think people here necessarily care if their neighbor is doing well,” Butler said. “But stagnation means being stuck in a rut. That’s a wrinkle that the Democrats missed in mid-America.”

Third, observers here said, the Clinton campaign tended to tailor their message to a range of constituencies – whether that’s women, the LGBT community or millennials. What the party lacked, they said, was an all-inclusive message that could motivate and unite everyone.

“The white working class didn’t hear a message about itself,” said Chris Petrone, legislative director of Operating Engineers Local 66 in Pittsburgh. “You may love your wife, but if you don’t tell her that, she’ll start to wonder.”

5. How much of Trump’s strength in the region stemmed from Obama voters who switched to Trump, as opposed to voters who hadn’t voted in recent elections coming out of the woodwork to back Trump?

This is a tricky one to answer.

On the one hand, “I do believe that some Obama voters went for Trump, partly because they thought the current direction of the country was not necessarily good for them, and partly because they thought Clinton represented the corrupt establishment,” said Raymond Wrabley, a political scientist at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown.

On the other hand, there’s powerful anecdotal evidence – such as DiSarro’s experience in Prosperity – to suggest a significant role for Trump’s ability to draw infrequent voters to the polls.

Ward, the Republican strategist, echoed DiSarro’s experience. He said he often works at his local polling place on election days, but standing in line this year, “I hardly recognized half the people. Usually it’s, ‘Hey Joe, how’s the wife?’ This year, I was looking up and down line and saying to myself, ‘Who are they?’”

6. How divided were labor unions in the presidential contest?

Nationally, Trump did much better with union voters than Romney did in 2012. Specifically, Clinton beat Trump among voters in union households by an eight-point margin, compared to Obama’s 18-point margin over Romney in 2012.

Union voting data is not available for the five southwestern Pennsylvania counties where Trump did especially well. However, observers here said that Trump probably won a significantly bigger share of the union vote in the region, since southwestern Pennsylvania outside of Pittsburgh and environs is overwhelmingly white, and minority union voters are widely believed to have voted more heavily for Clinton than union voters as a whole.

Marks, the AFL-CIO strategist, said it’s typical for Democrats to lose 30 percent of union voters off the top on social issues alone.

Petrone said that guns were a big issue for southwestern Pennsylvania union voters, but he didn’t sense that the Second Amendment played a bigger than normal role in 2016 than in past election cycles.

7. Would Bernie Sanders have done any better than Clinton in southwestern Pennsylvania?

The verdict here among experts was unanimous: No.

“I think he would have done worse,” Mikus said. In southwestern Pennsylvania, “if a contest is between someone who’s too liberal and someone who’s too conservative, voters here will go for the one who’s too conservative.”

8. Finally, can Trump expect his supporters to stay with him through thick and thin, or will many of his voters turn against him if he doesn’t deliver on his promises?

Going forward, this is perhaps the most important question for the Trump Administration. But in southwestern Pennsylvania, it’s not at all clear what the answer is.

“There were fervent Trump supporters in the region, but many others who weren’t thrilled with their choices at the presidential level and who took a gamble on putting a finger in the eye of the establishment,” said Wrabley of the University of Pittsburgh-Johnstown.

DiSarro agreed. “I don’t believe this was an ideological movement – it was a pragmatic movement based on the economic situation,” he said. The region’s economic stagnation is profound, he added. “The solutions are not going to be that easy,” DiSarro said.

Trump could hurt his own standing if he gives in to traditional conservative orthodoxy by cutting or restructuring Medicare and Social Security. “We still have a very old population,” Butler said.

The best-case scenario for Trump may be to frame the changes he is able to make and tout them as a needed change of direction. “I think if he gets some low-hanging fruit, that will satisfy some of the people who voted for him,” said Maggi, the Democratic commissioner in Washington County.

At least there’s one thing everyone can agree on. “This was a very strange election,” DiSarro said. “We’ll be studying it for years to come.”

November 21st, 2016 | Posted in Features, Front Page Stories, Presidential, Top Stories | 10 Comments

10 thoughts on “Eight Lessons from the 2016 Election”

  1. Randee Glore says:

    Good write-up. I surely appreciate your site. Keep it up!

    http://www.investopedia.com/advisor-network/advisors/61757/wendy-ann-payne-csa-cep-/

  2. Jannette Dilts says:

    This is the best search engine in the world

    http://google.com

  3. Seneca says:

    Payback from “flyover country”. Anyone aware of the deep resentment and concern for the future by people outside the country’s Democratic urban bastions would have known trouble was on the way for HRC and the Democrats in the 2016 election. Most observers were indeed surprised by how deep rejection of the Democrats ran here in Pennsylvania. But for months articles discussing popular sentiment here in the state by Salena Zito and others clearly indicated that the Democrats would have a fight on their hands to keep Pennsylvania blue, and that even if Trump didn’t win here state contests would likely still trend toward the Republicans.

  4. Casino Lobbyist says:

    Mike Ward should do everyone a favor and go drink some FRAC water, lots of it. He has some new state reps to send casino facebook messages to while mommy runs the committee. Kudos to Brad Bumstead on that article in the Tribune Review. someone should look into that.

  5. Trump says:

    Tim: Even my insipid tweets make more sense than your 4th grade writing. Looks like you missed a few Lessons in spelling, punctuation, etc.

  6. Tim says:

    Diano, are you just a spoiled rich kid who was brainwashed by the lefty professors at the expensive University your parents paid for you to get your edumacation? The lesson hear,is, people didn’t vote for Crooked Hillary because she has Parkinson’s disease, Brain Damage, and Dementia! She is physically unwell and mentally ill! She made a big issue out of temperament, but on election eve around midnight, when it became apparent she lost, she went into a drunken, psychotic rage and physically attacked 2 of her top level staffers, on being, John Podesta. She had to be physically restrained and then sedated. She was in no condition to address her supporters in the hall. She is the on who is the psycho, and and whose temperament was totally unsuited for the job. People saw this and elected Trump. Deathbed Hillary will be gone before too long in my opinion.

  7. Joe DiSarro says:

    Great article, I look forward to our next meeting, have a good day,

  8. David Diano says:

    gulag-

    Exactly. The pollsters missed the inbred voters.

  9. gulag Pittsburgh says:

    Notice the trend in SW PA. The closer to WVa, the worse Clinton did. What to conclude? I guess a woman can be your mother, sister, and aunt, all simultaneously, but cannot be your president.

  10. westerner says:

    People forget to looked at how Kathleen Kane destroyed any woman’s chances in Pa this year.

Comments are closed.