Search
Close this search box.

Entire Pa. Delegation Votes for Fiscal Cliff Deal

Official Portrait
Sen. Pat Toomey

Every Republican and Democrat who represents Pennsylvania in the U.S. House or Senate this week voted in favor of a deal to avert the so-called ‘fiscal cliff.’

The package allows Bush-era tax cuts to expire for individuals making more than $400,000 and families making more than $450,000.

The bill passed the Senate 89 votes to 8 on Monday and the House 267 to 157 late Tuesday. President Barack Obama signed the bill shortly after the vote.

Most of the objectors, particularly in the House, were Republicans. 151 Republicans voted against the bill and 85 voted for it – including Reps. Barletta, Dent, Fitzpatrick, Gerlach, Kelly, Marino, Meehan, Murphy, Pitts, Platts, Shuster and Thompson.

Two members who would have surprised few observers by opposing the deal were Sen. Pat Toomey and Rep. Mike Kelly, both vocal conservatives. They acknowledged that, given Obama’s recent re-election and continued Democratic control of the Senate, the deal was the best Republicans could get. Obama and Democrats flatly refused to consider any bill that extended the tax cuts for wealthy Americans.

Toomey is the former head of the conservative Club for Growth. He served on the ‘super committee’ that sought unsuccessfully to secure a solution to the problem in 2011. There, he put on paper what many called the only serious proposal by either party.

Toomey told reporters, “In the end what I was able to do was vote for a package that spares 99 percent of all Americans from a tax increase that would otherwise happen.”

Other members, including Rep. Tom Marino, agreed. “I am encouraged that both the House and Senate were able to come to an agreement and overcome the lack of leadership displayed by President Obama throughout this painful process,” he said in a statement.

The ‘fiscal cliff’ refers to a combination of drastic tax increases and spending cuts that were set to take effect on Jan. 1 in the absence of a congressional debt reduction deal. The situation was created by Congress during 2011’s debt ceiling showdown. Tuesday’s deal addresses the tax side of the equation and delayed the cuts for an additional two months.

Agriculture policies, including milk price supports, were extended until September.

10 Responses

  1. The entire Pa. delegation forgets why they were sent to Washington. Time to send them ALL home!!!

  2. Wrong move they make me sick…I cannot believe they are so weak why are they there if they cannot stick to principal these same ones would most likely pass Agenda 21 now that is scary

  3. Compromise, the art of giving the Democrats what they want to destroy the country. Great Job GOP. Time for a 3rd party.

  4. The Republicans will now face the Debt Ceiling Vote. Many think they have to be willing to see a government shutdown (not that many taxpayers would notice) rather than to cave again.

    Failure to get real and significant spending cuts, and, in particular, welfare entitlement reform may result in primary challenges or, worse, the Republican base refusing to vote for, and be complicit in economic suicide. Personnel is policy and there is no reason to vote for someone who is hurting you.

  5. It is about time they grew up, stopped acting like little babies, and worked to find a middle ground for the sake of the entire country instead of their own short-sighted interests. Now if they can only do this for the rest of the session, we will all be better off. Grow up, put on your big boy/girl pants, and learn the art of compromise!

  6. Rolled over & played dead. No real cuts – just $1.00 for every $41.00 of increased revenue. then we hear more “investment”. No revenue to pay down the debt, no revenue saved to reduce the deficit.

  7. I watched Toomey on Morning Joe this AM and his argument for voting for it made a lot of sense. Fact is if the GOP Members would have voted no and taxes would have gone up, then I believe even with safe seats, they would have been in trouble in a Fall election

Email:
  • Do you agree that ByteDance should be forced to divest TikTok?


    • Yes. It's a national security risk. (60%)
    • No. It's an app used by millions and poses no threat. (40%)
    • What's ByteDance? (0%)

    Total Voters: 30

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser

PoliticsPA

To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen