Josephs Ultrasound Comments Get National Play

If you think Tom Corbett’s quote was the most outrageous thing said about the ultrasound bill, you’d better close your eyes. Rep. Babette Josephs surrendered the rhetorical moral high ground to supporters of the bill in a big way on Monday, suggesting its female co-sponsors are “men with breasts.”

Reports Charlie Thompson of the Patriot-News:

[Josephs]  took specific aim at women lawmakers who co-sponsored the ultrasound bill, asking rhetorically, “I do not understand how a woman in this Legislature can say to herself: ‘I’m not capable of making my own health decisions… but I can get elected and make them for somebody else.’

“What is wrong with these women? What are they thinking about?” Josephs continued. “Are they women? Or are they men with breasts.”

The inartful comments have drawn fire from conservative pundits around the country. Writes Tina Korbe at HotAir:

She doesn’t understand it? I don’t understand it. By what logic are women who maintain that pregnancy is, in fact, the first stage of motherhood (i.e. that you are a mother from the minute you conceive your child) more manly than women who maintain otherwise? By what logic are women who want other women to realize their own motherhood moremanly than women who want otherwise?

“Apparently women cannot be truly women unless they support unfettered abortion,” writes Helen Whalen Cohen at TownHall.

The story is also up at the Huffington Post.

Update: The PAGOP issued a statement on the comments on Tuesday, from party Vice-Chair Joyce Haas:

“When Rep. Josephs called pro-life women ‘men with breasts’ she not only hurled a degrading insult to Pennsylvania women, she also removed any legitimacy the Democratic Party had in articulating their point of view on this issue, especially since neither she nor Democrat Leadership have apologized or denounced her comments,” she said.

As Thompson notes, a recent Quinnipiac poll showed that Pennsylvania women were evenly split (45 to 45 percent) on the ultrasound measure.

The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Kathy Rapp, would require women seeking an abortion to first obtain an ultrasound. Governor Tom Corbett’s comments on the subject, that women who didn’t want to view the ultrasound images could “close your eyes, drew ire from liberals across the county last week. (While Tribune Review writer Brad Bumsted argues that it was taken out of context and was never news to begin with).

In any case, it’s still unlikely to get a vote – let alone pass. Facing growing criticism two weeks ago, GOP leadership removed the measure from the House calendar.

March 27th, 2012 | Posted in Front Page Stories, Harrisburg, Top Stories | 7 Comments

7 thoughts on “Josephs Ultrasound Comments Get National Play”

  1. Joan says:

    Sign the petition demanding Rep Josephs’ resignation for her outrageous comments:

    http://www.change.org/petitions/rep-babette-josephs-resign-for-outrageous-comments-against-women#

  2. Kathleen says:

    Babette Joseph’s comments come as no surprise to those who have all too often been exposed to her crude, vulgar, and rude behavior. Pennsylvanians deserve better than this woman to serve in the House.

  3. Sara says:

    Joseph’s is absolutely right! To force a woman to have a possibly invasive ultrasound is akin to rape. What woman would subject other women to this? I think that she was saying that a woman who supports this, like a man, does not understand a woman’s body and her right to not have an object shoved into her uterus. For God’s sake, are we going to force women who have been raped and want an abortion to, once again, undergo the trauma of rape? Women who support this have to secretly hate themselves and their gender.

  4. Andrew Kleeman says:

    While Ms. Josephs has been a terrific advocate for women’s issues, this comment is equally offensive to women and men. As a candidate in the District bordering Ms. Joseph’s, I take objection to the implicit characterization of this important issue as male vs. female. In fact, the referenced March 12 Quinnipiac pole illustrates that more men than women are opposed to this outrageous personal assault, and Sen. Farnese’s proposed Colbert-like Bill further demonstrates this is simply not a gender issue. More men than women, myself included, are appalled by the egregious injection of government into this highly personal and important reproductive decision.

  5. Barbra says:

    No one knows why a women wants or needs an abortion. No one knows if it also was a family decision or a medical one. This PA. bill is a form of Psychological abuse. Besides we already have the abortion control act for the past 22 years in PA. Just adding this law is following other GOP Governors instead of being leaders they follow. Great leadership in PA.

  6. Oddly, I have heard many say the same about Babette Josephs. Could they be right?

  7. David Diano says:

    “Pennsylvania women were evenly split (45 to 45 percent) on the ultrasound measure.”

    This poll needs some clarification like:
    1) Have you every had an inter-vaginal probe?
    2) Are you still of child bearing age?
    3) Would you ever consider having an abortion?

    So, the bill pretty much doesn’t affect women over age 45 or young married women looking to start families.

Comments are closed.