Pennsylvania Key to Trump’s Electoral Hopes

How can Republicans break through the Democrats’ “Blue Wall” in the Electoral College?

According to Ronald Brownstein of the Atlantic, the GOP believes the Rust Belt may be the answer.

In 2012, Pres. Obama defeated Mitt Romney by 332 to 206 in the Electoral College.


In a Clinton-Trump contest, it is believed, the former Secretary of State would retain segments of the Obama coalition like college-educated whites, African-Americans and Latinos yet struggle among whites without college degrees.

In this scenario, Democrats would have an advantage in the swing states in the Southwest that President Obama won as well as Virginia and Florida.

A Republican nominee, however, could still win if they were able to pry Pennsylvania (20), Ohio (18), Michigan (16), Wisconsin (10) and Iowa (6) away. In that case, Trump would defeat Clinton 276 to 262.


Why those five states? Brownstein notes that Barack Obama equalled or out-performed his nationwide vote among whites without a college degree in those states.

“If Trump, as the general-election nominee, can merely drive down the Democratic vote among working-class whites in the Rust Belt to the level of Obama’s national performance in 2012, he can threaten to take all of these states, especially Ohio and Iowa,” he writes. “In 2012, exit polls showed that Obama carried 36 percent of whites without a college education nationally but drew 40 percent of them in Ohio, 43 percent in Pennsylvania, 44 percent in Michigan, 45 percent in Wisconsin, and 50 percent in Iowa.”

All this depends on other demographics remaining static. In fact, though, the opposite has been the case as the share of non-college whites in the Keystone State’s electorate dropped one-fifth from 1992 to 2012.

Furthermore, Trump is especially weak among college-educated whites (which Romney won by double digits in many of these states, including PA) as well as working-class white women.

As a result, the Rust Belt may not be as promising as Republicans hope.

March 29th, 2016 | Posted in Features, Front Page Stories, Presidential, Top Stories | 11 Comments

11 thoughts on “Pennsylvania Key to Trump’s Electoral Hopes”

  1. Yoosee says:

    So, the above figure predicted the Trump would become the president. However, based on yesterday’s stock market, Clinton likely will win the presidency election. If Trump wins the election, the de-globalization policy will ruin our business (currently, we export HD ip cameras to US market).

  2. Frank says:

    Hillary for Prison!

  3. Gunild says:

    Hillary — the most experienced and electable woman in the world — POTUS 2016!

  4. PhillyPolitico says:

    Bernie does better against Trump according to polls. Polls also suggested Syracuse wouldn’t make it to the round of 32, much less the Final Four. Polls are not always predictive.

  5. Isaac L. says:

    ADV – Bernie has never been subject to a concerted, national negative campaign.

  6. Owned by Bibi Kochs Waltons and Sheldon says:

    Unions will get their members in line in the end. All Clinton has to mention is Trump’s record on hiring immigrants and stiffing union members on jobs. SHOULDN’T be that difficult, but if anyone can readily fuck it up its Hillary.

  7. David Diano says:


    Lose some of the Romney states talking about immigration, and make the blue-states even bluer.

  8. HaHaHa says:

    That’s great, ADV. But Hillary will beat Bernie and go on to be the next POTUS.

  9. ADV says:

    Bernie does better against Trump than Hillary! In fact, Bernie does better against all the Republicans. Check out the polls.

  10. HaHaHa says:

    Hope you are right, Bucks!!

    Go Drumpf!!! Win that Primary !!!!!

  11. BucksVoter says:

    Hold the Romney states talking about immigration and blaze a trail through the Rust Belt talking about about free trade. It’s scary to think about, but Trump could possibly be successful.

Comments are closed.