Search
Close this search box.

Questions Mounting About Joe Sestak’s Latest Earmark Scandal

Allentown – Questions are mounting about Joe Sestak’s latest earmark scandal, first brought to light in the Allentown Morning Call on Saturday.  Now the Washington Examiner is asking: What did Joe Sestak know about the for-profit earmark request and what kind of research does he do on congressional earmark requests?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/what-do-atheism-and-wind-energy-have-in-common-101801008.html#ixzz0y6s9fjNx

What do atheism and wind energy have in common?

By: David Freddoso

Online Opinion Editor

08/30/10 11:50 AM EDT

The correct answer is “nothing,” but don’t tell that to Rep. Joe Sestak, D, who is running for Senate in Pennsylvania this year against former Rep. Pat Toomey, R.

Sestak has requested a $350,000 grant for the Thomas Paine Foundation, the Allentown Morning Call reports. The Paine Foundation is part of the Freethought Society of Greater Philadelphia, a tiny nonprofit (annual income: $14,000) seeking to purge religion from private life. The earmark is for the purpose of developing “a prototype Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT) that could be floated offshore, utilizing recent developments in air bearing technology that allow for more efficient generation of electrical power.”

If the grant is given, the money will go to Drew Devitt, the sole officer of the Thomas Paine Foundation. Devitt “also operates New Way Energy LLC, which is developing wind turbines for offshore use.”

Sestak’s office professes ignorance about this strange arrangement, and let’s give him the benefit of the doubt. But Democrats agreed to a moratorium on for-profit earmarks, and the purpose of the grant is such a mismatch with the purpose of this non-profit that one must ask: When people come begging for money at Sestak’s office, do they do any research into who’s getting the taxpayers’ money, or do they just offer to hand it out will-nilly?

Email:
  • Do you agree that ByteDance should be forced to divest TikTok?


    • Yes. It's a national security risk. (60%)
    • No. It's an app used by millions and poses no threat. (40%)
    • What's ByteDance? (0%)

    Total Voters: 30

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser

PoliticsPA

To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen