The Casey-Rendell Feud: A Reader

Rendell, left, and Casey

Last week, former Pa. Governor Ed Rendell said it was no wonder Sen. Bob Casey’s polling lead was shrinking because, “He hasn’t run a campaign.” It went downhill from there.

Republican Tom Smith outspent Casey about 3 to 1 in August and early September, particularly in the Philadelphia market where Casey’s ads were totally absent.

The began to impact the polls, which showed Casey’s advantage decreasing from high double digits in early September to an average of 6.5 percent today (and as low as 2-3 points in some independent polls).

Here’s Rendell’s original quote, reported by the Scranton Times-Tribune on Oct. 17, when Smith’s numbers looked their best so far:

“Casey? He hasn’t run a campaign. He’s run one ad, a stupid Tea Party ad,” Mr. Rendell said. “The Tea Party ad isn’t bad, but that’s all they’ve run. They’ve run a non-campaign up until now and Smith has put a lot of money into the campaign. … You start spending money, that’ll change.”

Casey’s media consultant, Saul Shorr, shot back in an interview with the Philadelphia Inquirer:

“Instructive criticism is one thing, but ignorance is something else,” said Casey’s media consultant, Saul Shorr.

Shorr, speaking to The Inquirer, said Rendell appeared unaware that Casey has two ads on the air in Philadelphia (and will start a third Saturday). He said Casey has run seven commercials statewide.

“His quote was all he’s seen is one ad; ‘He is not running a real campaign,'” Shorr said of Rendell’s remarks. “Well, we’ve been on the air in Pittsburgh and Johnstown since Aug. 1 with seven different ads.

“I guess it’s obvious that [Rendell] didn’t know that,” Shorr said. “But I guess that’s why the people who live out there thought when he left office that he was governor of Philadelphia.”

But Casey’s camp backed away from Shorr’s remarks in a letter to donors, reported Tuesday by Roll Call:

“If you’ve ever met a media consultant, you will likely know that sometimes their words and combative instincts can get ahead of reality and better judgment,” [Casey Campaign Manager Larry] Smar wrote.

“I want you to know that the recent comments by one of our media consultants, Saul Shorr, in the Philadelphia Inquirer were not authorized by the Casey campaign and do not reflect Senator Casey’s views,” continued Smar, who confirmed that he wrote the email. “Senator Casey appreciates the strong support he has received from Governor Rendell over the past 16 years in several campaigns and is looking forward to campaigning with the Governor in the days ahead.”

When reached for comment, Shorr said: “I have nothing to add and I’m fine with the letter.”

Roll Call also notes that Rendell and the Caseys have some history.

Bob Casey, Sr. beat Rendell for the 1986 gubernatorial nomination; Rendell beat Casey, Jr. in the 2002 Democratic primary for the same office.

October 24th, 2012 | Posted in Front Page Stories, Senate, Top Stories | 10 Comments

10 thoughts on “The Casey-Rendell Feud: A Reader”

  1. SWPAnnA says:

    Like Obama, Casey has not shown insight into electing other D’s to support his legislation. I would describe the Obama Campaign as Cannibalism – Democrats who want to win have run away from him and the efforts of the Party Builders have been ravaged in the last two elections. To keep this Change Hawk in office, the entire Party has had to forfeit viability. This has been a most unpleasant push; “progressives” in Primaries who can’t win in the Generals. PA Democratic Voters don’t recognize their traditional values in either the leadership or the failure to engage our strengths over gossip.

  2. maybe says:

    Look at the bigger picture ppl! He’s saving his $$$$ to run for governor in 2 years.

  3. Matt E. says:

    Apparently Mr. Rendell’s comments touched a nerve. Not because Mr. Shorr bristled at the remarks, but because Senator Casey is now running TWO ads in the Philadelphia market. As a result, we now know that Tom Smith is a rabid Tea Partier– and that Mr. Casey hangs out in biker bars.

  4. FBR says:

    this is what I’ve been saying all along. Casey wasn’t running a campaign. Great that he was running more ads in Western and Central PA, but the Philadelphia suburbs are where a lot of swing voters are, and that’s where he was only running the one “tea party” ad that was pretty lame. He needed to shore up his base here, which was being eaten away by the well run ad campaign that Smith was running.

  5. proudofphilly says:

    actually its vice versa. casey is counting on the obama campiagn to help his turnout. weather that well work time well tell.

  6. Bryan says:

    This is Spendell’s desperate attempt to remain relevant.

    That said, he’s right. Casey’s not a great campaigner; he lets his last name do all the work.

  7. Ryan says:

    Observer is right. Casey runs the risk of hurting the entire Democratic ticket. If Obama is dependent on Casey to get out the vote, Romney will win Pennsylvania.

  8. Observer says:

    Fast Eddie is an astute politician, if nothing else, and he’s right: Bobby has been coasting. What is he saving his money for? November ads? He did NOTHING in the biggest Philly suburban counties, where PA elections are won and lost. His lack of effort could hurt the entire Democratic ticket.

  9. brddddddddat says:

    this is better than Nas vs. Jay-Z

  10. Steelblitz1 says:

    Rendell is right…

    Casey has not been putting his time in on the campaign trail.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Fatal error: Call to undefined function popupwfb() in /home/politics/public_html/wp-content/themes/PoliticsPA 2014/footer.php on line 30