BREAKING: Supreme Court Rejects Kane’s Request
The full per curiam ruling is included below:
AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2016, because Petitioner did not seek recusal at the earliest possible time, her objection is waived as a matter of law and cannot form the basis to invalidate a judicial determination. See Goodheart v. Casey, 565 A.2d 757, 763 (Pa. 1989). Petitioner’s claims of bias are untimely and are not properly before this Court for consideration. Petitioner’s Application for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED, on the basis of waiver.
Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.