Search
Close this search box.

Castor Won’t Release Email Report

Bruce-CastorTurns out Acting AG Bruce Castor won’t release Doug Gansler’s report on the pornographic emails after all.

On Wednesday, those whose names were in the report were told and it caused a panic in the Attorney General’s office.

Now Wallace McKelvey of Patriot-News is reporting that Castor will be putting the report on an indefinite hold.

“While I remain Attorney General, I will not be approving the release of any part of the report until we can devise a procedure that, at the very least, allows for informed responses,” Castor stated.

It’s is unknown what Gov. Wolf’s nominee Bruce Beemer will do, although his tenure as First Deputy AG suggests he would be reluctant to cause such an uproar among the employees.

PoliticsPA reached out to the campaigns of GOP nominee John Rafferty and Democratic nominee Josh Shapiro to find out their positions.

“As a proponent of openness and transparency in state government, I obviously lean towards full public disclosure,” Rafferty responded. “However, in this instance, I do not believe it’s fair or appropriate for me to comment as to whether I would release the Gansler Report without first  thoroughly reviewing its content and the author’s reasoning behind his conclusions. As I have said from the beginning of this campaign, my goal is to restore integrity and leadership to the office Attorney General. I will implement a very strong ethics policy on day one that will ensure nothing like this ever happens again.”

“We haven’t seen the report so it’s inappropriate to say we’d release it; Josh has previously said he’s on the side of transparency and making the emails themselves public,” Shapiro Campaign Manager Joe Radosevich told PoliticsPA. “It was disturbing to learn today that Senator Rafferty has been campaigning with one of the guys behind this whole scandal and we wonder if he knows why it’s wrong.”

64 Responses

  1. The TRUTH (aka Jerry Mulligan)-

    Let’s be clear. I’m not claiming that’s your name, but rather the handle you have previously posted under. Please note the very clear distinction. So, I continue to ask, why you changed your handle.

    As for your “defense” of your errors, let’s be clear about that too. After your “initial check” failed (without mentioning the source you supposedly used), you declared me a liar and treated your own investigation as unassailable. When I confronted you with a linked-in page (from a simple google search of the agent’s name), you accused me (without proof) of creating a fake page.

    How thorough was your initial search, that you didn’t even Google the guy’s name and see his job, title, profession, etc? All it took was his name and “OAG”. It’s the first result. Duh.

    I’ve got no idea if he was promoted, demoted, reprimanded. If he was promoted, it may have already been in the works. Maybe he was blackmailing Kane for the promotion (as he frequently posted that he possessed damaging information on her). He seemed pretty fixated on her alleged personal relationship with her driver (taking that as his handle and making frequent references). Maybe he was a jealous ex-lover, or a wannabee lover? Who knows? He certainly was unprofessional and undeserving of a badge (which doesn’t seem to be a barrier to carrying one these days).

    But, he sure disappeared from here under his old handle. Has he reappeared under a new handle? I don’t know if he learned is lesson or not.

    BTW, are you challenging me to PROVE to the rest of the site that you unquestionably previously posted under the handle Jerry Mulligan. And, if you are challenging me, what will you do once I prove it?
    1) Admit it and take your lumps
    2) Pretend I didn’t prove it, while everyone else posts how I “got” you?
    3) Run away and post under a new, stupid handle?

    Or you could avoid all that embarrassment and concede that I have correctly matched you to your previous handle?

    In the immortal words of Inspector Callahan:
    — you’ve gotta ask yourself one question: “Do I feel lucky?” Well, do ya, punk?

    and

    — Go ahead, make my day.

  2. I will be happy to call you a “child predator” to your face. Just be a “real man,” post your real name and I will make it happen in the next week. In fact – I will call you a PUSSY to your face too. Looking forward to it!!

  3. Diano….please continue to use the name Jerry Mulligan and make sure it is the viles most hatred thing you can say. Make sure it’s not under an alias but your name. Let me thank you in advance.

    Once again Diano you lie and distort the truth and you know it.what I said was my initial check revealed nothing for an Agent by the name you mentioned. A subsequent check revealed that they thought he was promoted out of the Agent rank to a classification of supervisor because of your post. Kane had a way of doing that. Completely different database no access too. However, my contact said wouldn’t it be funny if this guy wanted to thank the reporter for a promotion and a substantial pay raise. Now your information is public. That’s the way that went and the way I wrote it. Now you wanted everyone to know that you were the guy behind the Kanesdriver investigation. Since America’s jurisprudence is based on facing your accuser why would you object if he had that information. No one I repeat no has ever implied it as a threat. As a good Democrat and maintaining an anti-police attitude I’m sure if there were differences and you two had occasion to talk it would be friendly and productive.

    Now labeling another person in this room as a child predator as far more serious consequences just by the name itself. These frequent comments are false, unjustifiable, libelous, and would never be said on a face to face. So you hide behind the keyboard and make such accusations when you get continually bested on this board. One thing I have learned and its evidenced by the number of members who come to yours and COTTS defense is that No ONE likes either of you. They now realize what a fraud you are. An unemployed list seller. Keep twisting the truth and we’ll get the right story out there. In the meantime you and COTT can keep making up more names and support yourself. You both are the laughing stock of this board. I noticed you did not defend yourself on revealing HAHAHA,s true identity when contacted by a social services group over your repeated use of the “r” word. So in addition to being a pathetic 50 year old virgin who lives in his moms basement and sleeps with super teddy you have been exposed as a fraud, liar, rat, and a coward. There is one redeemable feature. I like your brother Steve. You, on the other hand are nothing but a sucker on the tit of America. Other than that have a great day.

  4. DD – you are correct. Even Mrs. SpongeBob confirmed that SpongeBob has dirty wet homosexual prison sex fantasies.

  5. Robert B Sklaroff MD-

    What points are you looking for me to “refute”?

    Bruce Beemer isn’t there to be the “clean-up” guy. He’s there to be the “cover-up guy” so the email report never sees the light of day.

    The AG’s office is supposed to be an independent check on the Governor and other elected officials. So, putting his own guy in there guarantees no one from AG office looking in his direction now or when Josh takes over.

    You copied NEARLY the whole article, but “conveniently” left off the final thought:

    “On a different issue, one has to wonder why House Republicans are insisting they’ll continue with an impeachment investigation. As a convicted felon, Kane, a Democrat, can’t hold office again. Partisan politics?
    Move on.”

  6. SpongeBob-

    How can I point to a reference after it was deleted by the admins? You sure cried a lot about the deletions, refusing to acknowledge you had crossed the line. You clearly have no idea where the line is. That’s probably behind much of your fear over how much retaliation would come your way from everyone you’ve been here offending if they share your lack of morals.

    There was no one who thought my exposure would/could/should drive violence toward him. He posted his own resume online with his full address, occupation, and a tremendous load of BS self-promotion and horn tooting. His name has appeared in the news, like when he bungled a case against a casino dealer and falsely arresting him on trumped up charges, and the case was dismissed. He is a perfect example of what is wrong with law enforcement and a bullying mentality that needs to be scrubbed from police force.

    You fail to grasp the asymmetry of your’s and kanesdrivers actions, as you hide behind your anonymity, like the cockroaches you are afraid of any sunlight. You won’t level the playing field by holding yourself up to any scrutiny and can always retreat into other aliases, like Jerry Mulligan with his new “The Truth” identity.

    The Truth (aka erry Mulligan)-

    I posted a link to the linked-in page of an OAG officer who was stalking me, he subsequently disabled the link. Had I posted his address directly, rather than a link to his own PUBLIC linked-in page and resume, everyone would still be able to see it. Stalkers like SpongeBob can still look up the address in a voter file and post it, but stop lying and saying I posted his address.

    I did complain, using my real name, and requested that his work computers be checked for searches about me. You were here last week saying no such person existed at OAG. Then you claimed I made up a phony linked in page. Then I had to show you a news article with the agent.

    So, your claims that I didn’t report him using my own name don’t mean anything, nor do your other claims as to whether or not any action was taken against him. I reported him, and I left it to OAG to look into it. I don’t really expect them to discuss the matter publicly, but rather be professional (unlike him) and handle the matter through the chain of command. He deserves any punishment he gets for his misconduct.

    I wouldn’t go as far to say that I “rule” here, but I do dominate a bit. What YOU (and the other cowards don’t get) that my remarks automatically have 10x the value of yours, because I post under my own name, and don’t keep changing identities, Jerry Mulligan.

    HaHaHa knows that I have no idea who he, or Brett Cott, are. I never heard of Cott until SpongeBob and others started claiming he and HaHaHa were one in the same, and they started posting their own prison-rape porn fantasy fiction (which you probably masturbated to frequently).

    It takes all of you to gang up on me, and you still can’t win, because you hide in the dark (or the closet), and I’m out here in the sunlight.

    Still haven’t heard your explanation for changing your handle from Jerry Mulligan, coward.

  7. @ d4:

    Care to refute any of this?

    http://triblive.com/opinion/bradbumsted/11032405-74/kane-beemer-general

    The key issues facing Bruce Beemer

    BY BRAD BUMSTED | Saturday, Aug. 27, 2016, 9:00 p.m.

    HARRISBURG

    Now the clean-up effort begins.

    Bruce Beemer, a former Allegheny County prosecutor, was nominated by Gov. Tom Wolf and likely will be confirmed by the Senate to serve as attorney general through the remaining four-plus months of convicted felon Kathleen Kane’s term.

    Beemer’s the right guy. He knows the office having worked for former Attorney General Linda Kelly and then for Kane, most recently as first deputy. Beemer, now Wolf’s inspector general, testified against Kane at grand juries and was on her you-know-what-list while still in the AG’s office. She froze him out. She hired now-acting Attorney General Bruce Castor as solicitor general in March to have an experienced attorney she could count on for legal decisions and to further isolate Beemer. Kane’s law license was suspended last October after she’d been charged with crimes. A Montgomery County jury convicted her Aug. 15 of perjury, obstruction of justice and official oppression.

    Castor is viewed by many as a Kane operative, which he denies.

    Beemer was not a rebel in the AG’s office. He chose his battles carefully. He had the respect of most prosecutors and agents. He is a quiet leader.

    Some key issues he’ll face:

    • Putting the brakes on more taxpayer dollars flowing to BuckleySandler, the Washington, D.C., law firm Kane hired to do an investigation of pornographic and otherwise offensive emails crossing AG servers. Former Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler, of the same firm, has said the firm could be paid up to $2 million for the work. The tab now is nearly $900,000.

    Expect the report soon. Is there a rush to get it out before Beemer takes over?

    • Whether to fire Kane’s former bodyguard and confidant, Patrick Reese, who snooped on office employees’ emails to obtain information about the grand jury investigating her. Reese was convicted in a bench trial last December of indirect contempt of court. Under office policy, being charged with a crime should result in a suspension. But Reese has remained on staff at a salary of almost $100,000 a year. If that weren’t enough, Kane’s former political consultant Joshua Morrow testified at her trial that when he went to visit Kane, Reese took him to a parking garage. He confiscated his keys and cellphone. He then used an electronic device to make sure he wasn’t wired. It requires probable cause to detain and search someone.

    • Whether to fire Jonathan Duecker, another Kane acolyte, who was promoted to acting chief of staff by Kane. An agency personnel official recommended that Duecker be fired due to two sexual harassment complaints. The AG’s office recently settled the lawsuit filed by former Human Resources official George Moore over his firing. He received a $150,000 settlement package.

  8. Diano…..Just caught with my reading here. More lies and distortions of proof.

    You posted the personal information about Kanesdriver online. You filed a complaint ( so you say) but apparently didn’t leave your real name. You initially bragged about it and still to this day bought it up. Now your upset that you did all this and your afraid that he may know it was you. My thought is again you’re just not that important. You’re a nobody. Then again you’re a nobody that probably missed somebody off. Oh well.

    Ha Hu….. It was Diano that ratted you out. He posted something with the letter “R” in it and I heard that he may have been “contacted” by an advocacy group where he gave you up as making similar posts. You may have noticed he has backed off of that. There is a reason.

  9. Diano….what makes you think you are so important that people are stalking you. Get a grip man. Oh you probably already have a grip on HaHU. Anyway, if you rationalization is that when a person posts a counter argument to your exposing you for the phony, fake, fraud that you are that is correcting the record. You and HaHU have long attempted to rule here by posting your useless upsupported dribble. It was you who proudly stated you outed Kanesdriver. It was you that said there was a widespread fraud and illegal behavior by the police. Yet you cite 3 cases where the involved officers were investigated by the DOJ or arrested, tried and found not guilty. It could go on and on. You’re comments about a person liking chihildren is false and malicious as I know it is not true. Therefore, you posting these comments are worse than stalking (which you were not) you were trying to do the same as Kane. Blame an innocent person with a false accusation to damage their credibility not by what they did but by what you fictionalized. How bout that argument Davey Boy.

  10. Point to any such reference of me attempting in any way to incite violence against you. You will not be able to because none existed. As for your outing of the OAG agent. Your IP address match put him in the right geography not to his direct address. Also I find it interesting that you reminded everyone you knew his address and posted his information on the site. I in fact called you out for providing access to information that included his address and you had a witty response. Do you recall what it was? Maybe you should go back and look because it is quite relevant to your claims now. As for my actions are you going to arrest the fine folks at Google for making it easy to type your name and get back information that you in your side job have forced to become public. You choose that not me. So please lookup your comments when I blasted you for posting the agents personal info here and see if the shoe fits. I think it’s comical you can use this site to sore whatever “facts” you deem real but when actual facts are provided you bellyache about it. Boo freaking hoo. I have done nothing more here than duplicate exactly what you have done. Stop whining about it and go back to making up false narratives about people who disagree with you.

  11. SpongeBob-

    You know very well you posted real world address with clearly implied threats/incitement of violence with the “suggestion” that police harass or that others harass. Your comments were removed from the site as inappropriate.

    The difference (which you fail to grasp) is that I am a private citizen, and OAG agent was exceeding his authority and had made threats against me. He screwed up by investigating my linked-in profile and exposing his own profile. Police intimidation is a serious thing. He also made numerous comments Kane and her case that might have been leaks (depending upon their timing) as well as likely violations of professional conduct for his job.

    But, I didn’t post address or attempt to locate his relatives. I outed him because his identity was relevant to his comments and hypocrisy. I didn’t “stalk” him like you keep trying to stalk me. I caught him stalking me and reported him. It’s a HUGE difference.

    It’s also possible/likely that he performed a search on me using the OAG database, which would be a serious violation (by his own standards of saying Kane used the same database to search her political enemies when he called for her dismissal).

    There was absolutely 100% certainty as to his identity, given his link-in fingerprint (which is enough to report him in the first place), and the match of his IP address location to his home address on his published resume. And, his attempts to cover his tracks and delete his horrid posts about Kane and kill his disqus account were all icing on the cake.

    If I had misidentified kanesdriver, he would have blasted me, instead of trying to delete his online profiles.

    You’re the stalker here, just like he was.

    I’m sure your identity, if revealed, would show tremendous conflicts of interest and breaches of confidentiality agreements as well as blatant hypocrisy. You are clearly hiding, just like kanesdriver who could dish it out but not take it.

  12. Where have I ever attempted to direct violence towards you? Also since when is it illegal to type information easily found via search engines in public comments. Source me the case law that you feel is relevant. No different than you referencing other posters public information and using it to call them racist and other terms. Remember how your posted the information of the person you suspect was agent in the GA’s office? How is what I have done anything different. Oh that’s right it isn’t. You posted speculation that had a good chance of being factual but not 100% proof. Yet you posted it anyway. Given that the person you posted about is in law enforcement and you documented hatred of police from your posts here one could infer you were hoping to drive violence towards the agent in question. Not sure how you feel what I have done is drastically different. You see you can’t cry about others using the same tactics you have used. Go back to your hate mongering about those who have different opinions than you. It’s what you do best….

  13. SpongeBob-

    I’m not going to correct your mistakes in attempting to investigate the personal lives of my friends and family, nor tell you specifically where you crossed the line. But, if or when your identity is uncovered, your attempts to direct violence at me, my family, children, and people you’ve incorrectly associated with me will get their just punishment. If you are not already on a child predator list, you will be.

    I hope this Cott guy really has a lawyer looking into uncovering your identity.

  14. Everybody has pictures of Brett Cott. They are on the Internet. Do you have anything that proves (or even suggests) that Brett Cott posts comments (even one comment) here on this site?

  15. COTT, Are you religious? I am I pray to St. Theresa everyday. Do you know what she is the patron saint of? I may write a song about her to not the Saint though just the name. Baldy, when you going to pay the 60,000 you still owe the state. You’re a deadbeat man. A thief, a liar, some say a cheater, and felon. Plus, you have a big fat bulbous head. I have pictures.

  16. The Truth (aka Jerry Mulligan)-

    I never heard of Cott until you guys started claiming he was HaHaHa. Try again.

  17. SpongeBob-

    If all you cared about were my comments here, you wouldn’t keep attempting to take the argument outside of the site.

    Whistleblower-

    Yeah, I keep wondering about how they came up with the claim about Cott. I didn’t know if they posted their justification, or I just missed it. Sounds more and more like they don’t have any proof.

  18. Whistleblower, aka COTT yeah here’s the proof I said it ok. COTTS admitted it and Diano told me. So if that bothers go somewhere else but why would you I’ve got much more inside info on COTT and Diano to post. Oh yeah COTT, you still owe the state $60, 000. How about paying up you deadbeat.

  19. I have no proof. I just like typing “Brett Cott” …, prison ….. DD …., basement …. prison …, Cott …. Lists …., DD …. unemployed …. Basement ….., prison ….. Cott …. “Lock her up” …. prison …. DD …. basement …….. BENGHAZI ……., Cott ……………

  20. Can you (Spongebob) or anyone else (Truth) please post whatever proof you have that Brett Cott posts here at PPA.

  21. I do so enjoy the wit and humor Brett brings to the day with his original and in no way duplicated material. I wonder how much singing he did in prison though. I mean since he is a convicted criminal who was bested by Frank Fina of all people.

  22. Are you ready kids? “Aye Aye Captain”
    I can’t hear you! “AYE AYE CAPTAIN”
    Oohh…
    Who lives in a trailer and drinks lots of TEA?
    “SpongeBob Retard”
    Stupid and yellow and troll-like is he!
    “SpongeBob Retard””
    If Repervlican nonsense be something you wish
    “SpongeBob Retard””
    Then drop To your knees and suck like a fish!
    “SpongeBob Retard””
    READY?
    SpongeBob Retard
    SpongeBob Retard”
    SpongeBob Retard”

    SPONGEBOB RETARD! AH AHH AHH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHH…

  23. David,
    What part of what I have said was about someone with the same last name? I am curious because you make that claim but never refer to what specifically. No one cares about Steven or Super Anthony. They care about your ridiculous excuses you make for the cesspool that is the PA Democratic Party.

  24. bob caster aint gonna not let the report get out he aint got no write to block it from getting out the people have a write to see all duh commants from the people who emaled them,

  25. H3, I ask because it seems as if there’s no campaign for Rafferty at all? Believe it or not, I’m undecided. I have tried to get more information on both candidates but, whoever is handling Rafferty’s campaign, has done a piss poor job getting his message out. It makes me think Rafferty went with another party hack “consultant” instead of hiring a professional.

  26. The Truth-

    When did you decide to switch to the handle “The Truth” over your former handle: Jerry Mulligan

    SpongeBob is a creepy stalker who can’t tell real connections to me over connections to people with same last name or to underage children he’s mistaken for adults. If his identity is uncovered he will have a lot to answer for, not including all the child porn he probably has on his computer.

  27. Prison …. Cott ….. Prison …,, DD …. Basement …. Prison ….. Basement ….. Cott …… DD ……. Polly want a cracker ……

  28. HaHU aka Brett COTT….. Brett tell everyone what is was like in jail when you went there for stealing. I hear it was a “special” prison for people like you. Some of the other prisoners really liked the prom dress you used to wear on Fridays. How did you family pay the bills while you were in jail? I bet your mom and dad were real proud of you.

    Diablow……. Well if it isn’t the liar. I thought you were shamed when you challenged that guy to find stuff about you and he found out stuff about your mom, your brother Stephen and you have a teddy named Super Teddy. Must be fun living in the basement of your moms house and sponging off of her. You’re a police hating liar. A proven liar no wonder you’re an unemployed list seller. Is your date with Brett still on for tonight?

  29. Good Q Mikey. Doesn’t seem like he has much of a campaign. Which is understandable since he has no shot at winning.

  30. Pat, or moved slower so the problem would be Castor’s. In fact so a whole bunch of problems would be Castor’s. You know he is just loving this. Appoint Beemer on Castor’s first day. Bring the senate in a month early to vote. Then the bomb drops just in time for the hurried up transition. Castor to Beemer: “hurry back!”

  31. The Senate should have moved quicker. The cat is now out of the bag. Report will have to be released. Otherwise – the cover-up will claim careers.

  32. Rafferty was a bit of an unknown to me. Then I saw him hanging out with the Porn-gate Judge who was forced to resign. I will be voting for Shapiro.

  33. sounds like we need the newspapers and the ACLU to sue to get us copies of the Gansler report. let’s hope the case doesn’t go in front of a judge who was sending porn mails him/her self.

  34. Rafferty likes to file suit against people who say anything even remotely critical of him no matter how far he has to stretch it . Rafferty is a Mommas boy Is he still living with his Momma ?

  35. Shapiro is going to crush Rafferty. Philadelphia FOP endorsing Shapiro.

    Rafferty endorsed by Porn-Boy Judge. He is a joke.

  36. @observer-state FOP already voted to endorse Rafferty. Shapiro has an outside chance at lodge 5 in Philly if he’s lucky because McNesby has some personal political aspirations Get your facts straight. Who’s the joke now? Try not to comment on things you know nothing about moron.

  37. Wait –

    Old man Rafferty is a JOKE. And the FOP is endorsing Shapiro. Which makes you a JOKE too.

    Rafferty associating w McCaffery is just plain stupid. And it proves he lacks judgment.

    Sorry.

  38. Insane. Name the names. Show some moral fiber. We’ll get those names via FOIA if we have to, and hang them all out to dry. Somebody grow some stones!

  39. Rafferty has to see if his name is on the list before he comments on releasing the Gansler Report. And how many judges would owe him favors for not publicly disclosing their unethical behavior with prosecutors.

  40. Shapiro’s response is comical. He saw Rafferty being introduced to police officials at an FOP event by Mccaffery and ran to Phillymag like the bitch he is. Fact is, he was upset that the FOP and its members think he’s a joke with Zero experience and were generally ignoring him and he got upset. Grow a set Shapiro. Rafferty and Mccaffery were working on police and veterans issues together for 30 years. Or since you were in kindergarten.

Email:
  • Do you agree that ByteDance should be forced to divest TikTok?


    • Yes. It's a national security risk. (60%)
    • No. It's an app used by millions and poses no threat. (40%)
    • What's ByteDance? (0%)

    Total Voters: 30

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser

PoliticsPA

To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen