Close this search box.

Fitzpatrick Embraces No Labels in Bristol

Fitzpatrick No LabelsBristol — Mike Fitzpatrick (R-Bucks) casts himself as Pennsylvania’s bipartisan Congressman. He held quite a public meeting Saturday with the bipartisan policy group No Labels to emphasize it.

David Walker, a former U.S. Comptroller General and No Labels co-founder, joined Fitzpatrick at the Lower Bucks campus of Bucks County Community College.

The forum – where questions and much of the presentation were prearranged – focused mostly on Walker’s organization, whose slogan is “Stop Fighting. Start Fixing.” Fitzpatrick is among its 80 congressional members.

For example, Walker started the off the occasion with an approximately twenty minute long power-point presentation about the group and the bills it has advocated for (only one of which – a bill to replace congressional travel with teleconferencing – is principally sponsored by Fitzpatrick).

Walker pointed the finger at both parties. “Most Democrats are far left of center, most Republicans are far right of center.”

Fitzpatrick agreed with a caveat. “I noticed the left moved further left than the right moved further right” between his two terms in Congress (from 2007 to 2011).

In an increasingly partisan Congress, Fitzpatrick has a record that passes for bipartisan. He split from the majority of his party 19% of the time during votes in 2013 so far. That’s more than all but 16 of the 435 members of Congress and all but 3 Republicans according to the Washington Post votes database.

It matches the 8th district, which is comprised primarily of Bucks County.

“There are few districts that are competitive, this is one,” Walker said.

PA-8 very narrowly supported Mitt Romney last year. In fact, Bucks by itself equally narrowly supported President Obama. The Cook Partisan Index rates PA-8 a R+1 district.

Two Democrats are vying to face him in 2014, Shaughnessy Naughton and Kevin Strouse, and the race is likely to be the top congressional contest in Pa.

Redistricting flashback

Fitzpatrick said he embraces the toss-up nature of his district and that he turned down party leaders who offered him an easier, less competitive seat during the redistricting process. The new map would have split Bucks County in half and transfer the more Democratic lower half into the 13th district. Fitzpatrick said he rejected that idea.

“You’re not dividing Bucks County as part of the redistricting process,” he claims to have told them, because he felt representing all of Bucks made him a “more balanced, better representative.”

Though town halls have become notorious for instantly viral outbursts, there was only really one such expression of emotions from the crowd. It came when Walker stated that immigration reform was needed and the attendees responded with shouts and boos.

The tone of the crowd overall grew quietly yet noticeably angry over the course of the event. It was hard to tell, however, whether this was because Walker used most of the speaking time (he spoke first and responded first to four out of the six questions) or because all questions had to be written in advance. Instead of using the writers’ actual language, the moderator asked the men about each question’s topic. Ultimately, it seemed a product of the fact that the audience, which seemed significantly pro-Fitzpatrick, never got any chance to really interact with him.

2 Responses

  1. The Republican Party has moved so far right that Mr. Fitzpatrick appears moderate-to-liberal by comparison.

  2. This is an accurate portrayal of what transpired.

    Also noted were two comments from Fitz that appeared to mirror the stance of Boehner, et al.; he seemed to be reticent to commit to total defunding of ObamaCare [while touting his non-fiscal vote to denude it from the IRS] and he spoke of the need to invite illegal-aliens to emerge from the shadows [while touting his desire to secure the borders].

    Both postures exemplify why Heritage-Action has apparently prioritized its political activities in the 8th District.

  • Does the NYC Verdict Make You More or Less Likely to Vote For Trump in 2024?

    • Less Likely (36%)
    • More Likely (34%)
    • Makes No Difference (30%)

    Total Voters: 112

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser


To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen