Graph: What’s the Baseline for PA’s Job Growth Rank?

Job Growth chartJobs numbers are complicated. Both political parties will continue to cherry-pick from them to make their cases. There’s plenty of data to validate various arguments made by either side.

The latest debate is over the state’s job growth ranking. Pennsylvania was ranked 45th in the nation for June, 2013. It sounds awful at first blush – Pa. isn’t even in the top half! But the historic baseline shows that June’s ranking – while a noteworthy drop – is only about 10 places behind Pennsylvania’s average.

The graph above looks at how PA has performed versus other states in job growth over the past 20 years. On average, the state has ranked 34th out of 50.*

Why is this? Because Pa. is a bigger, older, northern state. Economists say all of those factors correlate with slower rates of growth even in the best of times.

That’s one of the reasons that the job growth rate ranking is not a very useful measure to determine the state’s economic health.

The ranking looks at the percentage increase in the workforce. So North Dakota secured the number one spot by adding 24,300 jobs in June (compared to the year before, June 2012). Pa. fell to 45th but added 27,900.

Pa.’s worst showing in the past two decades was November 1998, when the state ranked 47th… and added 91,100 jobs (compared to November 1997).

Pa.’s historic high came as the state added 42,400 jobs in February 2011 (compared to Feb. 2010). But since other states we impacted so much more by the recession, Pa. was ranked 5th.

In January 2010, Pa. was a whopping 13th… despite losing 185,600 jobs (compared to Jan. 2009).

The state’s rank has as much to do with the national economy and 49 other states as with anything happening here. And that’s even before one asks what a governor or lawmakers can actually do to change the trend. (Short answer: nothing. Slightly less-short answer: nothing that will have any noticeable effect during their terms in office).

But since candidates on both sides of the aisle campaign on these kinds of rankings, we’ll all continue to hear about them.

Just for fun, here is how the Governors fared on this measure:

Tom Corbett (R), Jan. 2011 – Jun. 2013
Average rank: 29.8
Rank at beginning of term: 6
Rank in June 2013: 45

Ed Rendell (D), Jan. 2003 – Jan. 2011
Average rank: 29.9
Rank at beginning of term: 21
Rank at end of term: 6

Mark Schweiker (R), Oct. 2001 – Jan. 2003
Average rank: 27.6
Rank at beginning of term: 28
Rank at end of term: 21

Tom Ridge (R), Jan. 1995 – Oct. 2001
Average rank: 39
Rank at beginning of term: 45
Rank at end of term: 28

Bob Casey Sr. (D), Jan. 1992 to Jan. 1995
Average rank: 44
Rank at Jan. 1992**: 36
Rank at end of term: 45

The numbers come from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, via the W.P. Carey School of Business at the University of Arizona. The data are not seasonally adjusted.

*Economists prefer the 12-month moving average of job data because it reduces the impact of outliers and random fluctuations. Rankings in this story will use the TMMA. In their attacks on Gov. Tom Corbett, Democrats have used the more simplistic ‘same month, previous year’ data set.

**ASU does not have pre-1992 data.

Bryan Magee contributed to this report.

6 Responses

  1. Businesses create SUSTAINABLE jobs, and the fewer dollars they pay in taxes, the more dollars they have to spend on employees. Teaching jobs, which are funded virtually 100% w/ public funds whether local, state, or federal, cannot be viewed through the same prism as purely private sector jobs since there is a taxpayer offset to the cuts.

  2. This is just more liberal baloney to make Republicans look bad. The statistics are in relation to other states. PA added more jobs (27,900) than Montana (24,300) this year but Montana is ranked first and PA 49th. It’s a devious sleight of hand maneuver because the statistic is “job growth” in comparison to last year. So if a state did poorly last year and did much better this year, then it gets a higher ranking than another state that had steady growth both years. It’s like ranking a Student One who got a B+ average in 2011 and an A average in 2012 BELOW Student Two who got a D average in 2011 and a B average in 2012 because the Student Two had a greater rate of improvement during the year. But Student One is definitely the better student because she got better grades both years just as PA created more new jobs both years than Montana. This is a textbook example of how the liberal media distorts the facts to make Republicans look bad.

  3. Corbett could have had better job growth but decided to continue with the business tax cuts when PA could not afford them. Between the tax credits, capital stock and transfer tax cut, random corporate tax cuts and the Delaware Loop-hole, Corbett could have had almost $4 billion in state coffers which he could have used to prop up education and help save the pension system. Instead, Corbett laid off 20,000 school employees.

  4. So…is the moral of the story that Governor Rendell and the Democratic House Majority did a great job keeping the Bush Recession from hitting PA too hard, and One Term Tom and his band of Turdzais could not keep up the Rendell/Dem House momentum? Corbett’s policies suck that bad so that while the rest of America is pulling out of a recession, PA is flat-lined and not flourishing? I mean this can’t be? The Corbett/Turdzai fracking Utopia has failed? Get the Frack outta here! who would’ve thunk?
    November 2014…can’t wait!

  5. Yes… it is that bad, especially if you are looking to be re-elected. I’m sure the GOP
    and some high brass consultants will look to “put lipstick on a pig”, but Corbett would be jealous of Specters re-election numbers.

  • Who are you voting for in the PA Supreme Court race?

    • Dan McCaffery (61%)
    • Carolyn Carluccio (37%)
    • Still undecided (2%)

    Total Voters: 344

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser


To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen