In PA-18, a Debate Over Debates

Camp Hill – Evan Feinberg took a quick trip out to the midstate to visit supporters at the Pa. Leadership Conference. In a room full of anti-establishment conservatives, the challenger to Rep. Tim Murphy had a number of friends.

Back in the 18th district in southwestern Pa., things aren’t going as easily. Murphy is putting his cash on hand advantage to use (he has $1,040,000 to Feinberg’s $40,000); he is already on television.

Feinberg has four weeks to make his case to Republican voters there, and overcome a deficit that a Murphy internal poll in February found was 74 to 12 percent.

He characterized his fundraising so far this quarter as strong – just as he did last quarter when he raised $50,000. He added that he expects to be on television before the race is done, but otherwise he is relying on a strong grassroots game. And some national conservatives have offered him a hand with name ID and fundraising – as Erick Erickson of RedState did today.

He predicted that the contested presidential primary will boost his chances.

“The presidential race will improve turnout, which is only good for me,” he said. “Presidential voters are going out to vote based on the issues, and when they look at my issues versus my opponent, they’ll see I’m the conservative in the race.”

But what Feinberg really needs is a game changer, and he’s hoping that a face-to-face meeting would give him an opening. But Murphy has yet to agree to a debate with Feinberg, or even commit the idea of having a debate.

The two men have spoken at the same event on two occasions, but never while the other was in the room. They have never shared a stage.

The campaigns blame each other for problems with various local debate invitations, and a detailed account from either campaign contains like a mix of mutual disdain and legitimate logistical problems.

Unlike the typical challenger, Feinberg isn’t requesting a dozen debates – just one.

“That’s all I’ve asked for, to put one debate on the calendar. The constituents deserve at least one debate,” Feinberg said.

Murphy’s camp cited his busy schedule.

“The Congressman has been at a number of speaking engagements with Evan but unfortunately, the Feinberg campaign has repeatedly chosen dilatory tactics that has prevented more events.  We are hoping they change course and begin to negotiate in good faith,” said campaign manager James Genovese.

“I will debate Tim Murphy anytime, anywhere, under any format,” Feinberg said.

5 Responses

  1. I dont see your logic? Tim Murphy is pro-gun, endoresed by the NRA. Tim Murphy is pro-life, endorsed by National right to life and PA pro life federation. He supports the energy here clean coal and natural gas and was a leader against Solyndra. He is a leader against Obamacare and Nancy Pelosi liberal agenda. People cannot call him a liberal. You can call him a moderate if you want but he’s NOT a liberal. I gurantee judy brown going to post on his page he voted for card check, schip, and ndaa like she always does. You can attack him on Schip because Im sure a large majority of people in his district support it.

  2. Rep. Murphy endorsed by NRA, Pro Life , Chamber of Commerce, local Republican committees. Feinberg gets endorsement of Senator Tom Coburn, his old boss! Senator Coburn who endorsed Mitt Romney, the father of Obamacare and gay marriage and climate change mandates in Massachusetts. Feinberg is the RINO, he’s not a Republican he’s just an opportunist like the senator. But Feinberg’s Clubber Lang impression is pretty hilarious except he forgot the “for NOTHIN!” Pity the fool.

  3. How anyone calling himself or herself a conservative could support Tim Murphy over Evan Feinberg is unclear to me.

    Jim Broussard and Citizens Against Higher Taxes present themselves as well…against higher taxes and yet, they endorse Tim Murphy. Have they looked at his record? Hack Republicans selling out conservatives is not a good policy.

    Press Release: Citizens Against Higher Taxes Endorse Congressman Murphy
    Thursday, March 22, 2012

Comments are closed.

  • Do You Agree With the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn Roe v. Wade?

    • No. (50%)
    • Yes. (47%)
    • Not Sure (3%)

    Total Voters: 109

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser


To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen