Search
Close this search box.

Kane Won’t Testify At Senate Hearing

Kane-ConferenceKathleen Kane won’t be making the trek to the Capitol building.

According to Brad Bumsted of the Tribune-Review, the Attorney General will not testify during the State Senate’s hearing concerning her potential removal from office.

State Senator, and Chairman of the committee investigating Kane, John Gordner says that Kane isn’t expected to be at Tuesday’s hearing.

“She’s preparing a response at this point but she is not expected to appear,” Kane spokesman Chuck Ardo stated. “She does not believe there are grounds for removal and she doesn’t believe the votes are there for removal to proceed.”

A two-thirds majority vote is required. If that threshold is met, Governor Wolf can remove Kane under Article VI Section 7 of the PA Constitution.

The Governor has indicated that if the Senate votes to remove the AG, he’ll follow their lead.

113 Responses

  1. David,
    As usual no substance and all bluster. What does it matter where I make a living or in what segment of the working world? Let’s focus on Kane and her impending doom at every turn. You know the AG who protected her sister who was part of the same group of people exchanging hate and porn mails while promoting a sexual harasser to be her chief of staff.

  2. SpongeBob-

    “Predicting the future without specifics” is no more informative than the daily horoscope.

    ex:
    Prediction: Kane will have a bad day soon

    A week later, claim bad event was the one you “predicted”

    Amazing!

    Who says you don’t work for the government? (directly or as a contractor)

    Are you now claiming/declaring you work only in private enterprise and not the government?

    “No money in that.” for Gov work? Really? Thought you were familiar with Delco and how the GOP machine managed to use the government to fund all sorts of lucrative work for its friends. Why do you think all those donors (especially law firms) give so much money, and get work subcontracted out to them (with very little bidding)?

    I’m VERY confident that I’m smarter than you, but you are the one who keeps proving it to me with every post.

    You have “the right information connections”? Sounds like you are channeling Trump, who know people who tell him things.

  3. David,
    Specifics are boring. Watching you and the others lament my lack of specifics but amazingly predicting future events is more fun. Also who says I work for the government? No money in that. information is king and I place a priority on having the right information connections. Plus stop trying to attack my IT knowledge. You make yourself look foolish. People who want to be smarter than everyone else in the room feel the need to constantly prove it. You seem to overcompensate for your fear of the knowledge that you aren’t the smartest person who posts here in the world of IT.

  4. Overweight Albert-

    Did you have to deflect a lot of seltzer at clown college?

    You just wrote: “Let’s hear you argue the facts.”

    Previously, you claimed people were calling for claims to be deleted because people (Kane supporters) couldn’t stand to hear the facts.
    “So all you Kane supporters want free speech and but then you want some of the posts in which the facts are justified and irrefutable deleted.”

    I DID respond to your claim that the calls for post deleting were for fake posters (trolls) using the names of other posters. I then asked you: “Who is calling for any other kinds of posts to be deleted?”

    You’ve never answered that question nor provided an example. So, who has been deflecting? (hint: check the nearest mirror)

    BTW, “Fat Albert” was created, produced, hosted and voiced by Bill Cosby. Clearly, you must want to be like Cosby to have picked such a handle.

    SpongeBob-

    You hear a lot of “rumors”, but never give any specifics. If you are doing computer work for the government at taxpayer expense, you shouldn’t be careful about what you leak. Though, given your level of expertise, the computer work is probably cleaning keyboards with a Q-tip.

  5. David,
    You sure do talk about me a lot. Maybe you should focus more on your conspiracy theories about the big bad republicans against Kane. Will you say the same if a certain federal agency reported run by your president comes knocking on Kane’s door? Will they be in on it too? Rumor has it someone’s trip to Haiti is causing some wrinkles for a few people. When more than Dave Peiffer take a deal to testify against her will you still shout conspiracy then?

  6. David, In my college they called what you wrote it was an attempt to deflect
    What did they call it in your grade school. ( My last ridicule of you ) Grow up David and be a man. I expect this type of reaction from the other nimrods but not you. You are supposed to be too good for that. Let’s hear you argue the facts.

  7. CandyCane-

    If the Feds have been wire-tapping the GOP, and their conspiracy to take down Kane (and backroom budget deals), they might not be coming for Kathleen.

    Still waiting for the other shoe to drop on all the people who talked to McCord and Fleck.

  8. Not sure which is funnier, comparing Kane to Rosa Parks or her sitting in jail proud of the million more votes she got than Wolf.

  9. Karen, she was using the “evidence” to blackmail. That’s why although she started receiving the emails in 2009 from her sister, she waited years to do anything about it. And it was only after victims stood up to her that she went nuclear–but did she release everything? No. Just what she could trickle out to damage her “War” enemies. This isn’t about PA for her, it’s been selfishness since 2009.

  10. rosa parks was the only person arrested on that bus, too. that doesn’t mean she was wrong. kane had damaging evidence on people in power; people with the power to investigate and indict. so i am not all that impressed with the fact she was investigated and indicted. in fact – it only helps to prove how desperate the people were to protect themselves.

  11. Overweight Albert-

    You must be a Cosby fan. SpongeBob should be careful about what you give him to drink.

  12. David , The attempt you all use to deflect, deny just don’t work anymore that’s why you utilize it. Anyone who posts on here like Unsanctioned R or SpongeBob et al must laugh as I do at all your comments and name calling. This is what your life has come too I’m sure your folks would be real proud of you all if they read what you write.

  13. Overweight Albert-

    Are you and SpongeBob lovers? He says similar stupid stuff.

    There are calls to delete the posts of fakers posting under the names of other posters.

    Who is calling for any other kinds of posts to be deleted?

  14. So all you Kane supporters want free speech and but then you want some of the posts in which the facts are justified and irrefutable deleted. Can’t argue the facts so make up, deflect, delete.

    Tell you what Sy lets start deleting the posts that are meaningless like the ones HAHAH that mentions trolls, or maybe David D’s calling people retards. Don’t worry if you can’t find them they are authenticated and kept in a safe place.

    Facts are Kane and her crew are the only ones arrested. There is no pending investigative cases involving Fina and others. She won’t testify because she doesn’t want to incriminate herself and others and you boys have nothing left.

  15. Anyone want to bet their anonymity that Gansler will release the union members’ names on any emails?

    We won’t know all the freaks’ names in the AG’s office as long as Kane is there.

  16. I’d like to know if Seth Williams’ new “Chief of Staff” even interviewed with the HR folks. Was she vetted by the Hiring Committee? Or did Fina’s lawyer’s wife just walk off the street into a high-paying City job for which she has ZERO qualifications?

    Seth has some explaining to do.

  17. I’d like to know who was on the address lines like was released for Kane’s “War” enemies. And why were these emails withheld until last week or so when we found out Kane herself was a recipient of the emails since 2009?

  18. Let me just say this right now —

    If the below was sent by Granahan using her State computer (or server), I hope the Special Prosecutor sees fit to indict her:

    “Domestic Violence: Because sometimes, you have to tell her more than once” – depicting a woman with a black eye.

  19. “Maybe Pat can explain why when her sisters emails were released they redacted to to, from and BCC lines very much unlike she has done when releasing and trying to blackmail the others? Where is the outcry for hiding those names unless it could embarrass those close to Kane?”

    Just saw this was to me SpongeBob. Are you saying the white knight has a double standard? That doesn’t help her credibility. But, it would fit the narrative Rendell figured out about her (and 12 jurors soon).

  20. Though I agree that Mr. Sklaroff is insufferably annoying, I do like when he e-mails Sy Snyder to have the troll’s comments deleted. He is useful in that regard. Maybe I will e-mail Sy this time.

  21. Thanks! I thought the tone and low level of discourse sounded familiar. I will make sure I don’t “feed the trolls.”

  22. There’s that threat again. I’m surprised you didn’t first tell us you were getting our comments removed! LOL

    There’s no trick marie. You’re either a gullible fool who believes her or, you’re like the David and recognize that Republicans are afraid of Kane because of what she hasn’t yet released. That’s the M.O. she’s been playing for a long time now. Remember, she’s known about these emails since 2009.

  23. WAH !!! Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh WAH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You said “retard.” I used to ride short-bus!! Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
    Stop saying “retard” … or else!!!!!

  24. I don’t believe Granahan is alleged to have e-mailed this to her all-White pals:

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/zadock1/3580634808 … That was Fina.

    I don’t believe Granahan is alleged to have sent around a “motivational poster” suggesting that female employees needed to perform oral sex on their male bosses … That was Fina too.

    The devil is in the details!!

    And Granahan’s e-mails were, in fact, turned over to the Special Prosecutor before the laughable media event the Clown Car tried to create after they handed that allegedly corrupt politician the 2nd sweetest plea deal ever (#1 is Tyron Ali’s). We can rest assured the Special Prosecutor will arrest her if she committed any crimes. Not sure Granahan’s e-mails would rise to Justice Castille’s definition of a violation of the Crimes Code like he said some of the other more obscene e-mails did).

  25. Marie – now the troll is trying to get you to respond using “Unsanctioned R” … Don’t flu for it. It;s the same moron.

  26. That’s OK marie, you can look Kane’s sister’s anti-gay stuff up yourself. I got what I wanted. I thought you may be a Democrat hack and you admitted it for me. Like Kane and NOW, you only care if a Republican does it. I don’t suppose you believe Kane didn’t know what was in the envelope? LOL

  27. When will someone in the Press finally ask Seth Williams about his new “Chief Integrity Officer” and “General Counsel”??? I mean – do they really think it is just a coincidence that she is Fina’s lawyer’s wife and that she stands to gain from the $$$-driven lawsuit Fina filed against the State of Pennsylvania?

    And are we really supposed to believe it is just happenstance that Fina’s lawyer just so happens to be Tyron Ali’s lawyer …. and that Fina just so happened to let Tyron Ali keep the $400,000.00 he stole from a non-profit set up to help children?

  28. Marie – See Aaron’s comment below. Fat Troll Al is the same pathetic gamer troll who pollutes these boards regularly.

    DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS.

  29. Any moron who starts with “If Kane is so innocent” is too dumb for me to waste any more time on. Change your screen-name and try again!!! LOL ‘

  30. Marie. Uhhhhhh when were they turned over? Only after their existence was publicly made known. Kane never said a word about them till she was caught.You are smart enough to know Marie that Kane’s sister’s emails don’t fall into that good ole boys defense we heard so much about.

  31. By all means!! Please go on!!! Celebrating Kane’s sister’s inappropriate e-mails is boring. My understanding is that her e-mails were turned over to the Special Prosecutoe for potential prosecution.

  32. Hax3 If Kane is so innocent why not testify at the hearing today. It would be a perfect time for her to tell all about the others. Oh yeah about the others there is so much corruption that Kane has gone to a Democrat US Attorney’s Office to report all this illegal behavior.
    Guess not. Looks like Kane and her band of co-conspirators will be the only ones arrested and hopefully convicted. Maybe then you’ll crawl under the rock you came from.

  33. Who has any doubt that our highest law enforcement official didn’t knowingly leak the smear memo in the envelope she admits handing over to be leaked?

  34. here’s a sample of what’s been released from Ms. Granahan that Marie is defending as not racist or sexist:

    “Domestic Violence: Because sometimes, you have to tell her more than once.” Including a picture of a woman with a black eye.

    a photograph of an African American toddler bedecked in gold jewelry and clutching a stack of money – “disgusting . . . obviously racist,” said the NOW representative who hasn’t called for the Kane sisters’ resignations.

    “Illegal Immigrants: Millions of them come in and only one bastard actually works.”

    There’s also some good stuff for the LGBT community. Shall I go on?

  35. Scranton Sucks-

    Yes. Kane would still get more than Wolf did.

    Kane (all AG races) in a presidential year.

    Even Dave Freed, who lost to Kane with only 2,313,506 votes, got more than Wolf.

  36. Marie,

    You are assuming there will even be a trial. I know Kevin Steele handled the PH for Republican Ferman. But, now that he is the boss in MontCo, I just can’t see him being stupid enough to put himself in the “circular firing squad” this whole mess has become.

    Think about it – the star witness (Morrow) totally told two different stories. The corrupt ayy-holes running the grand jury run with the one they like (the one where Kane did something). But his original statement is that Kane did nothing.

    There is a pattern here. People give statements. Then “prosecutors” like Fina and the “not-so-special” prosecutor get them to come in and say something different. Look at Beemer. He writes a memo detailing the serious issues with Fina’s steaming pile of dung (sting) case. He says that Fina targeting Blacks was improper and that the plea deal Fina doled out to his lawyer’s other client was “unjust.” Then they get Beemer to come in and say something different later. How convenient!! Of course – Beemer now has every reason to try to hurt Kane. It’s absurd.

    This trial is going to be so fun!!! Even though I think Steele will be smart enough to make sure it does not go to trial, I am kinda hoping he doesn’t. POPCORN will be ready!!!

  37. My guess is that AG Kane’s defense will be that there is no credible proof that she illegally leaked protected grand jury material. There is really nothing to “believe” in that defense. The prosecutor will either have enough evidence or he/she won’t. That’s how the criminal justice system is supposed to work. Of course, when Frank Fina is involved, key facts detrimental to the accused always seem to get “leaked” to the Press. That is illegal and it makes it tough for the accused to get a fair trial – but that is the intent! Luckily for AG Kane on this one, Fina put himself, his Judge buddies, and the rest of the Corbett Pervs in play when he challenged the AG to a televised debate and mis-used grand juries to protect him and his friends. It didn’t work. And the world now knows who is be hid the bs case against Kane. Jurors will know too.

  38. Not even Hahaha(and all his other names) will claim to believe KK’s defense! Not a one of them.

  39. Has Eakin resigned yet?

    btw —- Uneducated R … Suck Boy … Larry … Fat Ass Al … Daddy … SpongeBob … and 82 other screen-names …. all the same pathetic, pock-marked gamer troll.

Email:
  • Do you agree that ByteDance should be forced to divest TikTok?


    • Yes. It's a national security risk. (60%)
    • No. It's an app used by millions and poses no threat. (40%)
    • What's ByteDance? (0%)

    Total Voters: 30

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser

PoliticsPA

To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen