NYT Profiles Pat Toomey

Pennsylvania Senator-elect Pat Toomey graces the front page of the New York Times website this afternoon. The story paints the portrait of a man with sincere and consistent conservative views, but also a willingness to be open-minded and work across the aisle. Toomey is politically pragmatic too, as he cannot alienate Democrats and Independents if he hopes to be re-elected in 6 years.

Read the piece here.

Senator-elect Patrick J. Toomey at a restaurant in Emmaus, Penn. Matt Rainey for The New York Times.

Some excerpts:

Conservative Seeks Political Balance on His Way to the Senate

By Katharine Q. Seelye

ZIONSVILLE, Pa. — Patrick J. Toomey was elected to the Senate in November as part of the Republican revolution, with a big assist from Tea Party activists, an endorsement from Sarah Palin and the expectation that he would join with other antiestablishment conservatives to remake Washington. But as he prepared to take office this week, Mr. Toomey hardly sounded like a partisan rabble-rouser.

Mr. Toomey’s goals have remained fairly consistent over his time in public life: to cut spending and overhaul the tax code. He also wants to scrap the Democrats’ new health care law. And he intends to continue to push for allowing young people to invest part of their Social Security payroll tax.
But he signaled in the interview, as he did during the campaign, that he would not be an ideological purist.

Mr. Toomey’s goals have remained fairly consistent over his time in public life: to cut spending and overhaul the tax code. He also wants to scrap the Democrats’ new health care law. And he intends to continue to push for allowing young people to invest part of their Social Security payroll tax.

But he signaled in the interview, as he did during the campaign, that he would not be an ideological purist.

His neutrality on the tax compromise suggested that he would not be an automatic vote for Mr. DeMint, whose political fund gave Mr. Toomey’s campaign more than $5 million. Neutrality also lets him avoid having to pick sides, for now, between Mr. DeMint and Mr. McConnell.

One Response

  1. Unquestionably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the internet the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people consider worries that they just do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

Comments are closed.

Email:
  • Do You Agree With the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn Roe v. Wade?


    • No. (50%)
    • Yes. (47%)
    • Not Sure (3%)

    Total Voters: 109

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser

PoliticsPA

To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen