PA-BGT: GOP Push Forward on Pensions, Wolf Unlikely to Budge

wolf-budget addressIn a move that could chew up several weeks, GOP State Representatives are working on sending a municipal pension reform bill to Gov. Tom Wolf’s desk, where it will presumably be sent back with a veto.

The Senate Finance Committee approved House Bill 414, which supporters call “an effort to provide local governments with the pension relief they’ve been requesting,” Chris Comisac of Capitolwire reports.

The bill would make municipalities’ pension contributions more predictable, while capping employee overtime at 10% of salary and changing the accounting practices used to determine a plan’s fiscal health.

The bill was approved on a party-line vote with committee Democrats saying it doesn’t ensure retirement security. Sen. John Blake, committee minority chairman, said Democrats are “80% on board” with the bill, but “it is very difficult for us to agree” without certain recommendations from Auditor General Eugene DePasquale being included.

DePasquale’s recommendation that the state should create a new benefit structure has created the chasm, according to a letter sent to Wolf from several PA mayors.

Labor unions have led the push against municipal pension reform, as noted by committee majority chairman John Eichelberger.

“There’s some willingness on the municipalities’ parts to work on this – there are contribution issues and things like that – but the bottom line has been the police and firefighters have not been willing to sit down at the table,” Eichelberger told Capitolwire. “Their answer is ‘we don’t want any changes to the municipal pension program,’ and that’s unacceptable.”

Sen. Art Haywood backs the labor unions, questioning whether uniformed professionals can survive on the pensions they would receive under the bill.

“If a person retires at 55 or 60 years old, and their last pay was $75,000, 25% of $75,000 is $18,750,” Haywood said. “To retire on $18,750, without Social Security, which is the position of many of these folks…on the police side – is something I just can’t support.”

7 Responses

  1. Most of these folks do not “retire.” They get second jobs, usually with the state (liquor store clerks) or as school resource officers. They end up with two, three or even four pensions. They live rather comfortably. Now — these are police and firefighters. They deserve to live comfortably. But please, let’s not pretend that they do not have Social Security — they get it from other work. And they get other pensions. The reality is that the current pension structure is unaffordable.

  2. I suggest eliminating legislator pensions entirely. Why give them a reward for doing a bad job?

  3. It’s time for Wolf to “push forward” on shutting down fracking. It’s dangerous and polluting the environment, and the taxpayers aren’t getting full value for the extraction (and will get stuck bearing the cost of cleanup). The extraction tax is better solution to the funding crisis than raising the sales tax.

    SGTBrubaker-

    People retiring early get reduced benefits.

  4. Wolf better figure out that his position on Kane is all wrong. There needs to be an Impeachment trial if the Repervlican-led PA Senate is going to “get rid” of Kane.

Comments are closed.

Email:
  • Best Cheesesteak in Philly


    • They Ain't Listed Here (33%)
    • Dalessandro’s Steaks and Hoagies (29%)
    • Pat's King of Steaks (9%)
    • John's Roast Pork (9%)
    • Steve's Prince of Steaks (9%)
    • Tony Luke's (6%)
    • Geno's Steaks (4%)

    Total Voters: 232

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser

PoliticsPA

To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen