Close this search box.

PA17: Lamb, Rothfus Talk Trump, Kavanaugh and More in 1st Debate

On Monday, Reps. Conor Lamb (D-Allegheny) and Keith Rothfus (R-Allegheny) participated in their first of two debates engaging in a wide variety of topics, that included national issues and sometimes distancing themselves from their respective party. The 1 hour debate between the candidates for Pennsylvania’s newly drawn 17th district was hosted by KDKA in Pittsburgh.

The candidates were asked about the situation and handling of Dr. Ford’s sexual abuse allegations against Justice Brett Kavanaugh and whether more hearing were needed to “get all of the facts.”

Both Lamb and Rothfus said no to that, according to KDKA.     

KDKA reports that Lamb attempted to avoid angering Trump voters in a district that the President carried by a couple of points in 2016.

Rothfus tried to pin Lamb with progressive Democrats who would like to see the President impeached.

“If you want to see gridlock set in in the United States Congress, that’s what you would have,” said Rothfus according to KDKA. “You would have endless investigations. The best economy in 20 years and we don’t want that interrupted.”  

When Lamb was asked about impeachment he didn’t think it was appropriate for Democrats to be vouching for it.   

“None of us has seen any evidence relating to impeachment of anyone, so it would be totally premature and those in my party who are already calling for that are wrong,” Lamb said.

Both candidates also attempted to distance themselves on occasion from certain members of their party.

According to WESA, Rothfus tried to distance himself from the Trump agenda when immigration was asked about.

“We need workers in this economy,” Rothfus said. “We’ve got to grow this population.”

“After the debate, Rothfus explained his position on immigration by saying he backed the Securing America’s Future Act, a measure proposed by Virginia Republican Bob Goodlatte and backed by NumbersUSA, a group that favors adopting higher barriers to immigration,” WESA reported.

Lamb attempted to distance himself with the progressive wing of the Democratic party on the issue of free college tuition at public universities.

“I have been just as critical of those on my side” as he has of Republicans, he said. “We have to be square with people about how we’ll pay for those ideas.”

For further in-depth coverage, here are the links to the debate recap from various news outlets.

KDKA: Rothfus and Lamb Both Agree And Disagree On Key Issues

WESA: Lamb, Rothfus Trade Views In First Of Two TV Debates

Tribune Review: Conor Lamb, Keith Rothfus vie for undecided voters in TV debate

Post-Gazette: U.S. House candidates Rothfus and Lamb avoid extremes in debate

7 Responses

  1. Rothfus was an original member of the Freedom Caucus (Tea Party) until someone told him it wouldn’t play well in the new 17th. He was a card carrying Tea Partier in his gerrymandered district but now he isn’t. You can’t have it both ways Rothfus. You’re unfit for people bloc office.

  2. ERGO – If a majority of voters in the 17th believe in the regressive, right-wing agenda of the Republican party then you’re right. But they shouldn’t fool themselves in thinking that Keith Rothfus has been an independent voice in Congress. Rothfus has never voted his “conscience” but rather toed the line of the radical Tea Party agenda and has only done what Speaker Paul Ryan and the Koch Brothers demand of those who get the campaign donations. SEE WHAT I DID THERE

    1. Never stated that Rothfus is some independent voice. He’s campaigning on issues that the Republican party has been promoting. It’s Lamb who has been playing games, trying to promote himself as some sort of Mini-Manchin. Allegheny county voters seem to love their taxes, at least the ones who haven’t already moved north, so there’s a good chance Lamb will win.

    1. If a majotity of voters in the 17th believe in the progressive, left-wing agenda of the Democrat party then you’re right. But they shouldn’t fool themselves in thinking that Conor Lamb will be some independent voice in Congress. The only way he will get to vote his “conscience” is if the Democrat leadership doesn’t need his vote, (which will be very rare) otherwise he will most definately toe the line.

  • Understanding that basic education funding should/will be first, what should be the next highest priority for the General Assembly?

    • Raising The Minimum Wage (25%)
    • Legalizing Adult-Use Marijuana (24%)
    • None of the above. Something Else. (20%)
    • Economic Development (14%)
    • Higher Education (8%)
    • Public Transportation (8%)
    • Workforce Opportunities and Innovation (2%)

    Total Voters: 51

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser


To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen