Close this search box.

PA18: Doyle Challenger Surpasses $100K in Q2

Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Allegheny) hasn’t faced a well-funded primary challenge in decades. 

That streak appears to be over after Jerry Dickinson, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh, reported raising over $100,000 in his first quarter as a candidate. 

Dickinson’s campaign raised $105,000 from the beginning of April to the end of June, while spending $10,000 during this time period. He entered the spring with no cash on hand and entered the month of July with $95,000 on hand. 

Doyle, the longest tenured Democrat in Pennsylvania’s Congressional delegation, raised just under $130,000 from the beginning of April to the end of June, while spending over $60,000 during those three months. Doyle has raised just under $190,000 in the election cycle-to-date and holds close to $330,000 cash on hand. 

Over $100,000 of Doyle’s funds raised in the quarter came from a number of joint fundraising committees, while Dickinson didn’t raise any money from PACs during this time period. 

At this point in Doyle’s previous reelection bid, he raised just under $175,000 in the election cycle-to-date and held just over $260,000 cash on hand. 

Doyle, who was first elected to the House in 1994, has never faced a primary challenger who raised over $100,000 in an election cycle, let alone one quarter. The last time he faced a Democrat who raised over $70,000 in a cycle was in 1996 against Joseph Rudolf. Doyle’s 1996 reelection bid was also the last time he faced a general election challenger who raised over $100,000. Republican David Fawcett, raised just under $350,000 in that cycle

Doyle has cruised to double-digit victories in primary bids during his tenure and has often run unopposed in general elections as well. He’s accustomed to breezing through the primary, so much so that when WESA interviewed him on Monday about a variety of topics, including Dickinson’s bid, he shook off the notion of a primary challenge. 

“Well, first of all, I don’t have opponents yet,” Doyle said to WESA. “There’s three people that I’ve read that are interested in my seat, and I’m sure there might be more than that come the filing deadline. So … I don’t really pay much attention to [them]. My job is to represent the people of the 18th Congressional district, and if I do my job elections take care of themselves. I don’t waste a lot of my time worrying about what other people say who may or may not be on a ballot eight months from now.”

According to the Pittsburgh Current, Dickinson took those comments from Doyle as “dismissive and disrespectful.” 

“In 2020 you’ll be facing a constitutional law professor who has already raised more than $100,000, eight months out from the election and you’re going to say that you don’t have a challenger?” Dickinson questioned according to the Pittsburgh Current

Dickinson also said he was “too familiar” with those comments “as an African American man” and added that he’s a serious contender and is qualified for the job. 

Doyle shot back in the Pittsburgh Current story saying that he wasn’t dismissive of Dickinson and said he can’t spend time responding to every comment from a challenger, but took issue with his opponent “trying to make this about race.” 

When Dickerson entered the race, he said it was “safe to say” that he was challenging Doyle “from the left.”

3 Responses

  1. I’m all for getting rid of Doyle, but the left has long lost its mind over race. It’s absurd and sad when a well paid college professor still throws a race card out the very first opportunity. The left used to be the party of tough blue collar workers, now it’s all about victim hood and race baiting. Sad.

  2. Doyle has been dismissive for a long time. This WESA story gives readers a taste of what he is really like. He’s short tempered and dismissive of many in his Party and his District. He has a sense of elitist entitlement about him. Another establishment politician who needs to get on with his life’s work. Can’t wait for the primary debates when voters can learn about all the perks. The Professor will own him in the debates.
    We can only help Fitz campaigns for him to really ensure an embarrassing defeat.

  • Reader Poll: Should President Joe Biden Step Aside?

    • Yes. He should step aside because of his age, declining ability to do the job. (45%)
    • No. He should not step aside. (39%)
    • Yes. He should step aside because he can't beat Donald Trump. (15%)

    Total Voters: 231

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser


To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen