Close this search box.

Reader Poll: Do You Believe Kathleen Kane is Guilty or Innocent?

Kane-Constitution CenterWe are just a week away from the start of Attorney General Kathleen Kane’s trial.

The AG is facing twelve counts, two counts of perjury as well as ten misdemeanors. Those misdemeanors include: three counts of official oppression, three counts of conspiracy, two counts of false swearing and two counts of obstruction.

Since the trial is sure to be followed throughout the commonwealth, we wanted to get a sense of how our readers felt before it started.

Then perhaps afterwards we could ask again and compare the results.

So, dear readers, let us know what you think.

Do You Believe Kathleen Kane is Guilty or Innocent of the Charges Against Her?

  • Guilty (71%)
  • Innocent (29%)

Total Voters: 760

Loading ... Loading ...

35 Responses

  1. I happen to be commenting to make you be aware of of the wonderful encounter my friend’s child gained checking your blog. She discovered several pieces, including what it’s like to possess a wonderful helping style to have the others smoothly fully grasp certain hard to do things. You truly surpassed our desires. Thanks for imparting those practical, trustworthy, edifying and cool thoughts on your topic to Gloria.

  2. Hello there, simply turned into aware of your weblog via Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I am going to be careful for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Many people will probably be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  3. The truth is that I have never been close enough to smell her breath. But – boy would I like to be!! Kane is smokin hot !!!!!!

  4. Wait – I thought Hillary was the “witch.” Or maybe McGinty. It’s now Kane? That term just applies to all successful, powerful women?

  5. Kane is doing whatever it takes to prevent the trial. She knows what’s coming at the trial. Ding Dong the witch is soon to be dead.

  6. “Bob”is not a Democrat. He is a cowardly FOXtard who types on the internet all day and gives $10 blow-jobs all night. Poor thing. His wife can’t stand him. He has a retard kid. And he can’t even troll well. LOL

  7. Of course, she was caught red-handed breaking the law, so it doesn’t matter if this is payback. She broke the law and should see the inside of a prison cell.

  8. RESIDENT – that is correct.

    Unless and until Fina & The Corbett Pervs get prosecuted for the many illegal leaks from the very grand jury that investigated Kane’s alleged misconduct, this prosecution of Kane will be a trumped-up fraud.

    Think about it — the people behind these charges had motive to set up Kane. And then they went ahead and did exactly what they are accusing her of doing. There were tons of illegal leaks from the Kand GJ. When is someone getting prosecuted for those?

    This case reeks of political pay-back.

  9. Very political, all the MONTCO DA needs to do is to look under his own nose of “people” doing the same thing as Kane but they are in the “group”. This has been nothing but politics

  10. It’d be ok to just let her finish her term (which concludes in a few months) and move on. I’m not sure I understand the foundation for the charges.

  11. I don’t remember seeing too many Kane fans here. But there are many who would root for ANYONE to take down racists, perverts, and misogynists.

    I am glad Kane took down “Fina & The Corbett Pervs. And now I hope she goes to jail if she knowingly leaked protected material to embarrass a political enemy (even if that enemy is a total POS).

  12. Where is the source of everyone know that perjury charges are only applied if a prosecutor is desperate? I think Kane will do anything to avoid the trial because she knows the best is yet to come. If this thing does not get plead out get your popcorn ready. There are some fun factoids that will make even the most loyal Kane apologist cringe.

  13. I agree with Observer:

    Everybody knows that only desperate prosecutors tack on perjury charges only when they lack confidence in their original case.

    Kane has always maintained that she did not illegally leak anything. If the perjury charges rest on some document that mysterioudlsly showed up in Kane’s Office the 4th time they searched it, the perjury will be NOT GUILTY too.

    Now add on the Dougherty angle. All the witnesses against Kane are Johnny Doc guys. And guess who was caught up in Porngate — Kevin Dougherty (John’s brother).

  14. Ms. Kane has repeatedly tried to change the subject ever since she was charged. She has tried various legal maneuvers to get the charges tossed.

    Nothing has worked.

    The questions still are: Did Ms. Kane leak secret grand jury material?

    Yes or No?

    Did Ms. Kane commit perjury on the witness stand?

    Yes or No?

    Ms. Kane said she hasn’t decided if she will testify in her defense.

    Mark Twain once wrote, “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.”

    In other words, the truth can withstand any degree of questioning and cross examination in a courtroom.

    It’s only when you fabricate stories to cover your tracks does that become a problem.

    Ms. Kane has a lot of problems.

  15. I think the better question would have been, Stupid or Not Stupid. Her behavior, like Hillary’s with her server, may or may not meet the guilty beyond a reasonable doubt standard. But stupid? Kane met that threshold with virtually ever move she made once elected with a paranoid style that made Stalin look like a relaxed, easy going guy.

  16. Everybody knows that desperate prosecutors tack on perjury charges only when they lack confidence in their original case.

    Kane has always maintained that she did not illegally leak anything. If the perjury charges rest on some document that mysterioudlsly showed up in Kane’s Office the 4th time they searched it, the perjury will be NOT GUILTY too.

  17. Sure she was setup. They figured out how to implant a chip into her that allowed them to speak for her and they MADE her lie under oath. Yeah that’s it. Totally makes sense now.

  18. Let’s face it – these criminal charges are sketchy. Trump would definitely call the prosecution of AG Kane “rigged.” Just look at the underlying allegation by “Fina & The Cotbett Pervs” (good one Marie!) that got the ball rolling. They accused Kane of doing what they do on virtually every case they prosecute.

    There is actual evidence that Frank Fina introduced a Kane enemy to journalist Craig McCoy so that he could illegally leak material.

    AG Kane was set-up. Plain and simple.

  19. And even if Kane admitted to every detail of the charges, I would still refuse to believe it because my worldview is based on an irrational hatred of Fina and Corbett. In other words, I am not a rational person and should not be allowed out of the house unsupervised.

  20. Here come the Kane Krusaders arguing that it is always someone else’s fault she is in trouble. She is Guilty and is desperate to keep the truth from coming out.

  21. Ugh. Come on, Nick. The choices are “Guilty” or “Not Guilty.”

    And the issues in her trial are very nuanced. The trumped-up charges were carefully crafted to make it seem like Kane did something that she did not.

    Unless they have her fingerprints on the papers given to the Press, there is no way they can prove she was the one that did it.

    The Govt’s star witness on that point has told two completely different stories.

    Their “snitch” – a person who ADMITS he illegally leaked secret GJ material – is still working at the Attorney General’s Office!!

    This case is rotten to the core. The guys behind it are Fina & The Corbett Pervs.

  22. will leave that up to a jury after they hear all the evidence–lets always hope that guilt or innocence is never never determined by a poll

  • Does the NYC Verdict Make You More or Less Likely to Vote For Trump in 2024?

    • Less Likely (36%)
    • More Likely (34%)
    • Makes No Difference (30%)

    Total Voters: 112

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser


To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen