14 Responses

1. That is the best search system in the world

   http://google.com

2. It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt
   donate to this fantastic blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for
   book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account.
   I look forward to brand new updates and will share this site with
   my Facebook group. Talk soon! fotbollströjor

3. Phil Hughes: Isn’t the content cheap enough already?

4. Funny how national polls give just the opposite result.

5. Stop wasting your time.

6. Please remove these polls. They are unscientific and ruin the credibility of your site.

7. There is nothing scientific or controlled about these polls at all. I’d consider abandoning them. Are they just click bait?

8. Clearly 500 people illegally voted for Trump in this poll. (This is how Trump does his math for results he doesn’t like.)

9. I will be saying adios to PoliicsPa. Thanks for the memories.

10. Utter bullshit. Remember your Reader Polls for ATtorney General & Treasurer. How’d they turn out?

11. I’ll keep saying it. These polls only cheapen the rest of the content on this site. They are not taken seriously by those in the know, either.

12. I doubt an online poll like this should ever be considered valid, scientific or other, apart from being an imperfect barometer of PoliticsPa readership. But that may be saying something, if the viewpoints of PoliticsPa readers mean much to anyone. After all, why are we here reading the articles and each others’ comments?

    It might be interesting to run this poll again in six months or so to see how readers might think of Trump & Co. at that time.

13. Did you apply the Russian bot factor? This poll isn’t scientifically valid until you multiply Trump’s votes by 0.6 to account for IP addresses originating from Moscow.

14. …despite consistent bashing by the [print/broadcast] media.

Comments are closed.