Spending Plan Agreed To, No Revenue Package Yet

A view of the Pennsylvania State house from the State Street bridge in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, January 18, 2012. REUTERS/Tim Shaffer

A view of the Pennsylvania State house from the State Street bridge in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, January 18, 2012. REUTERS/Tim Shaffer

State lawmakers and Governor Tom Wolf agreed on a $32 billion budget agreement Thursday evening, despite concerns on how to fund the budget, in order to make progress before the fiscal year ends Friday.

Gov. Wolf supports the spending bill, according to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, although it is unclear if he will sign it without a revenue package.

The Wolf called the bill “a bipartisan compromise that invests more in our schools, protects seniors, creates jobs, and builds on our fight to end the heroin epidemic.”

The plan increases public education by $100 million, increases spending for services for the intellectually disabled and pays into the commonwealth’s pension obligation, according to an article from State House Sound Bites.

Some cuts to Medicaid and consolidation of agencies were also written in the plan, along with some significant mergers.

The Board of Probations and Parole is merging with the Department of Corrections. The departments of Health and Human Services are also merging, although, as Wolf wanted, the departments of of Aging and Drugs and Alcohol are not.

“I’m pleased with what the product that will be leaving the Senate tomorrow looks like,” Minority Leader Jay Costa (D-Allegheny) told the Post-Gazette.  

Costa supported approving the spending bill despite not having a way to pay for it.

“It’s making certain that we pass the budget on time, to be able to allow government to continue as we figure the revenue side of the equation. Ideally, I’d like to have it all done by now, but that hasn’t happened,” he told the Post-Gazette.

Senate Appropriations Chair, Republican Pat Browne R-Lehigh), told State House Sound Bites that it will take a while to work out the details.

“What we’ve done so far is significant, but our members, our committee chairs want to take a really thorough review to make sure it’s done right,” Browne said.

The budget will not be balanced without a revenue package which will likely not be done this week.

Spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, R-Centre Jennifer Kocher told the Post-Gazette senators will finish work on the revenue package next week.

The Senate passed the spending plan this morning, and sent it over to the House.  The bill passed 43-7.

Update: The House passed the spending plan by a vote of 173-27.  The bill moves to Governor Wolf for his signature.

June 30th, 2017 | Posted in Front Page Stories, Governor, Harrisburg | 13 Comments

13 thoughts on “Spending Plan Agreed To, No Revenue Package Yet”

  1. Agen Bola Terpercaya says:

    Thanks for information I am very happy to read your review. Agen Bola Terpercaya

  2. Agen Bola Terpercaya says:

    Hopefully your website becomes the first and best in the eyes of google search Agen Bola Terpercaya

  3. Ganool says:

    presentation of the article in this blog is very nice, I like it

    Film Semi
    Nonton Movie
    Nonton Film Online
    Bioskop Online

  4. Chuckie Porter the rat says:

    No video game terminals!…unless La familia gets to collect from them. We are already taking a beating in our casinos so we need sports betting to make real money. Wait…no…that would put our bookies out of action and the state would take a bigger chunk. I better talk with the godfather on this. Even with a D.A. In the family we still can’t make no money.

  5. gulag Pittsburgh says:

    A spending plan is not a budget, so there is no budget agreement. There is only a spending plan agreement.

  6. David Diano says:

    Properly tax shale extraction.

    1. Robert Howard says:

      Yea, it makes a lot of sense to tax the one thing that promises growth and jobs in PA.

    2. David Diano says:


      Job growth for whom?

      Out of state workers? Cancer doctors? Funeral directors? Drug dealers? Environmental remediation companies?

      Promises of job growth, but not the job growth promised. Shale could/should be taxed at 10%, not the measly 5% Wolf asked for.

  7. Kevin Michael says:

    We need to spend a lot more than that on public education in the inner cities and not on prisons. I am very disappointed in the rethuglikkkans not caring enough about disenfranchised persons of color and instead catering to heroin-addicted rurals

    1. Robert Howard says:

      Are you kidding me? Exactly how much to you want to spend on unsafe failing schools? If you really cared about disenfranchised persons of color you would be advocating for parents and students instead of unions leaders protecting a failing system. You would be advocating for school choice.

  8. Barricks Einwohner says:

    What would you choose; tax and spend or borrow and spend? Another year of smoke and mirrors. Furloughs on the way.

    1. John says:

      I’m in for tax and spend. No corporate tax cuts they have had too much already.

Comments are closed.