
DeFoor: DCNR Ignored its Internal Policies and Procedures When Awarding Grants for Conservation Projects
Says used its own discretion when awarding some grants despite advertising it as competitive process.
Says used its own discretion when awarding some grants despite advertising it as competitive process.
Auditor General Timothy L. DeFoor recently released an audit of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) that showed it did not award all Community Conservation Partnerships Program (C2P2) grants competitively, instead using its own discretion when awarding some grants despite advertising it as a competitive process.
“We found instances where DCNR executive management made the decision to award grants to applicants who missed application deadlines, funded projects that were ranked lower than others or ignored the ranking all together,” DeFoor said. “This is very concerning because DCNR’s executive management opened the door to outside pressure and influence in awarding state grants by not solely relying on the advertised process. When management can make its own rules, it diminishes the integrity of a grant program.”
The audit, which included grants issued between July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2023, had three objectives:
Auditors had three findings in the audit, which include:
Auditors provided seven recommendations to DCNR to improve the grant process and oversight. These include following existing policies and procedures, using electronic submission of documents to monitor grants and improve oversight of the inspection process for federally funded grants.
“The good news is that we have an agency that is willing to implement change and do better,” DeFoor said. “DCNR’s commitment to supporting these projects is commendable, but these are taxpayer-funded programs. When it comes to spending taxpayer dollars, internal controls and processes must be followed and any practice that undermines objectivity, accountability and transparency must be eliminated.”
Auditor General Timothy L. DeFoor recently released an audit of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) that showed it did not award all Community Conservation Partnerships Program (C2P2) grants competitively, instead using its own discretion when awarding some grants despite advertising it as a competitive process.
“We found instances where DCNR executive management made the decision to award grants to applicants who missed application deadlines, funded projects that were ranked lower than others or ignored the ranking all together,” DeFoor said. “This is very concerning because DCNR’s executive management opened the door to outside pressure and influence in awarding state grants by not solely relying on the advertised process. When management can make its own rules, it diminishes the integrity of a grant program.”
The audit, which included grants issued between July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2023, had three objectives:
Auditors had three findings in the audit, which include:
Auditors provided seven recommendations to DCNR to improve the grant process and oversight. These include following existing policies and procedures, using electronic submission of documents to monitor grants and improve oversight of the inspection process for federally funded grants.
“The good news is that we have an agency that is willing to implement change and do better,” DeFoor said. “DCNR’s commitment to supporting these projects is commendable, but these are taxpayer-funded programs. When it comes to spending taxpayer dollars, internal controls and processes must be followed and any practice that undermines objectivity, accountability and transparency must be eliminated.”
Auditor General Timothy L. DeFoor recently released an audit of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) that showed it did not award all Community Conservation Partnerships Program (C2P2) grants competitively, instead using its own discretion when awarding some grants despite advertising it as a competitive process.
“We found instances where DCNR executive management made the decision to award grants to applicants who missed application deadlines, funded projects that were ranked lower than others or ignored the ranking all together,” DeFoor said. “This is very concerning because DCNR’s executive management opened the door to outside pressure and influence in awarding state grants by not solely relying on the advertised process. When management can make its own rules, it diminishes the integrity of a grant program.”
The audit, which included grants issued between July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2023, had three objectives:
Auditors had three findings in the audit, which include:
Auditors provided seven recommendations to DCNR to improve the grant process and oversight. These include following existing policies and procedures, using electronic submission of documents to monitor grants and improve oversight of the inspection process for federally funded grants.
“The good news is that we have an agency that is willing to implement change and do better,” DeFoor said. “DCNR’s commitment to supporting these projects is commendable, but these are taxpayer-funded programs. When it comes to spending taxpayer dollars, internal controls and processes must be followed and any practice that undermines objectivity, accountability and transparency must be eliminated.”
Auditor General Timothy L. DeFoor recently released an audit of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) that showed it did not award all Community Conservation Partnerships Program (C2P2) grants competitively, instead using its own discretion when awarding some grants despite advertising it as a competitive process.
“We found instances where DCNR executive management made the decision to award grants to applicants who missed application deadlines, funded projects that were ranked lower than others or ignored the ranking all together,” DeFoor said. “This is very concerning because DCNR’s executive management opened the door to outside pressure and influence in awarding state grants by not solely relying on the advertised process. When management can make its own rules, it diminishes the integrity of a grant program.”
The audit, which included grants issued between July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2023, had three objectives:
Auditors had three findings in the audit, which include:
Auditors provided seven recommendations to DCNR to improve the grant process and oversight. These include following existing policies and procedures, using electronic submission of documents to monitor grants and improve oversight of the inspection process for federally funded grants.
“The good news is that we have an agency that is willing to implement change and do better,” DeFoor said. “DCNR’s commitment to supporting these projects is commendable, but these are taxpayer-funded programs. When it comes to spending taxpayer dollars, internal controls and processes must be followed and any practice that undermines objectivity, accountability and transparency must be eliminated.”
Will tonight's U.S. Senate debate affect your decision?
Total Voters: 27