Close this search box.

The Political Evolution of Southwest PA

Southwest PABRIDGEVILLE, Pa. – Not many years ago, Joseph DiSarro recalls, you could go out to grab coffee on Murtland, Ave., not far from his office at Washington & Jefferson College, at 6:45 or 7:00 in the morning and be the only customer in sight.

But drilling in southwestern Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale formation has changed all that.

“Now the trucks are parked everywhere – you can’t even get a spot. Drilling has had a tremendous impact on the economy, and it will have an impact on the politics,” said DiSarro, a political scientist who has followed developments in this region of southwestern Pennsylvania since moving here in 1977. “We’re experiencing a political realignment in Washington County. I think the election results from 2014 demonstrate that this is serious.”

The economic changes from drilling have been significant, but they are only the latest sign of a political transformation in this corner of the state, where registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans by a 3-to-2 margin.

Signs of this realignment – specifically, a shift from the region’s Democratic roots to a Republican ascendancy – have been under way for several years, as this author has documented in dispatches for PoliticsPA from southwestern Pennsylvania periodically since 2009.

Bolstered by voters’ disaffection with the national Democratic Party’s stances on social issues, guns and the environment, and aided by a pro-Republican redistricting map in the state, the GOP has managed to win all but one of the region’s congressional seats and has gained ground in lower offices.

Even though Democrat Tom Wolf ousted incumbent GOP Gov. Tom Corbett in 2014 — and even though the Democrats maintain a near-stranglehold on statewide offices — the results of this November’s election may represent a turning point in this transition.

  • In the 46th state Senate district — which includes most of Washington and Greene counties and a sliver of Beaver County — Republican Camera Bartolotta, a political novice, knocked off incumbent Democrat Timothy Solobay, 53 percent-47 percent.
  • In the open 32nd state Senate district, which includes portions of Fayette, Westmoreland and Somerset counties, Republican Patrick Stefano defeated state Rep. Deberah Kula, 57 percent-43 percent.
  • In the 46th legislative district – which includes portions of Washington and Allegheny counties — Republican Jason Ortitay ousted Democratic incumbent Jesse White, 56 percent-44 percent. White had not even faced a challenger in 2012.
  • GOP Rep. Keith Rothfus, whose district stretches from Beaver County east to Cambria County and had been competitive for several election cycles running, sailed to a second term, 59 percent-41 percent.
  • Rep. Tim Murphy, a Republican who’s more friendly with labor than most of his GOP colleagues, didn’t even get major-party opposition in 2014.
  • Corbett lost his reelection bid by a 55 percent – 45 percent margin, yet managed to win Washington County, 52 percent-48 percent, and Westmoreland County by a whopping 57 percent-43 percent margin.

As J.D. Prose of the Beaver County Times summed it up in his post-election coverage, “Beaver County, long the home of labor strength and true-blue Democrats, now has two GOP state senators, two GOP state representatives, and a Tea Party-backed Republican congressman who easily won the county.”

Prose noted that more Republican straight-party ballots (9,910) were cast than Democratic ones (9,183) in the county.

What became clear in 2014 is that “the national Republican wave was a local wave in southwestern Pennsylvania,” said Jon Delano, a political analyst with KDKA-TV in Pittsburgh.

David Patti, president and CEO of the Pennsylvania Business Council agreed. “The trend manifested itself first at the top of the ticket, but has now moved down to statewide and state legislative races,” Patti said.

Patti said that southwestern Pennsylvania “may be registered Democratic, but that means little. They are pro-God, pro-life, pro-gun, moderate on the environment, moderate on tort reform, and are not anti-business. They are pro-labor and don’t see that as incompatible with these other considerations. Like Ronald Reagan, they believe they aren’t leaving the Democratic Party – they believe the Democratic Party at the top of the ticket has left them.”

Jack Manning, an Independent who ran for Beaver County Commissioner in 2011 and who chairs the county’s economic development task force, said Republicans have shown they can overcome the region’s embedded Democratic registration edge. In 2014, “the Republicans put up better local candidates and were much better financed,” Manning said.

This can be seen in the arc of several of the races noted above, where the Democratic candidate held leads until late in the contest, said Mike Butler, a Pittsburgh-based Democratic consultant who has worked with Sen. Robert Casey, state Treasurer Rob McCord, and former Rep. Jason Altmire.

Solobay and White both had personal issues to overcome. Solobay had many conservative positions in tune with his district, but he faced intense fire over his high ranking in payment of legislative per diems – the reimbursements for food and travel expenses while the legislature is in session. A group affiliated with GOP state Sen. Scott Wagner, spent at least $434,000 against Solobay late in the contest highlighting the per diems.

Making matters worse, Solobay’s name came up in the investigation of a man shot to death in 2011. Police confirmed that he was not a suspect, but the revelation proved to be a distraction, observers said.

Meanwhile, White had to deal with revelations that he had surreptitiously bullied commenters who backed shale extraction. He apologized, but the damage was done.

“The word did not get through to the establishment Democrats that they needed to work on their campaigns,” said Kirk Holman, a former Republican official and political observer in California, Pa. “A week before the election, people told me that (Solobay) had nothing to worry about. There may not be a fundamental swing to the Republican Party yet, but there is a competitiveness that was not present here before.”

The rapidly advancing energy boom has sped up the process of realignment, observers here said. In this once-sleepy corner of the state, landowners have signed mineral leases and out-of-state energy companies have flooded the region with business and jobs. To the extent that there’s an environmental downside to the drilling, it hasn’t yet taken precedence in local public opinion, observers say.

“The Marcellus Shale is a game-changer, just like the heavy industry that came before it,” said Larry Maggi, a Democratic commissioner in Washington County for more than a dozen years. “It has literally changed Washington County’s economics. It has opened up opportunities that have never existed before. Instead of exporting of our kids, our youth are staying here.”

One of the emblematic changes from the energy boom is a transformation in the role of organized labor. Labor has historically been strong in the steel and coal sectors, but those are declining; unions are significantly weaker in the growing, shale-related sectors.

“Labor is still a force, but not nearly as strong as it was, due to the shrinking manufacturing roles,” Manning said. “There is a strong but aging demographic that is active in voting, but not nearly as powerful as in previous decades.”

And to the extent that unions are closer to the national Republican Party than the national Democratic Party on resource-extraction and environmental policy, winning the backing of labor is no longer a slam dunk for Democrats.

“In southwestern Pennsylvania, private sector organized labor — Teamsters, boilermakers, electrical workers, carpenters — are often helping Republican candidates behind the scenes, if not overtly,” Patti said. “Corbett enjoyed a good deal of support in southwestern Pennsylvania private-sector organized labor. Business leaders are correspondingly moderate and often not particularly anti-union.”

Meanwhile, the region is sorting itself out ideologically to an unprecedented degree, observers said.

Pittsburgh and swaths of surrounding Allegheny County suburbs “are trending more and more blue,” and the exurbs are becoming more and more red, said Eric Hagarty, deputy campaign manager for Wolf and campaign manager for Bill Peduto, who won Pittsburgh’s mayoral race in 2013.

With tech-related growth spawned by Carnegie-Mellon and the University of Pittsburgh, young people are flocking into the Pittsburgh area, instead of out of it, for the first time in decades, said Mike Mikus, a Pittsburgh-area native who ran the pro-Wolf FreshStart PAC in 2014 and was a consultant for former Democratic Rep. Mark Critz, who lost to Rothfus in 2012.

In his first run for governor in 2010, Corbett narrowly won Allegheny County, but this year he lost it by 60,000 votes. And Peduto won the mayoral race running as an unabashed liberal.

“Pittsburgh has been a Democratic city as long as anyone can remember, but it was a union town full of Democrats with a conservative streak, especially on social issues,” Governing magazine wrote recently. “Now Peduto is helping to reshape Pittsburgh into an assertively liberal city, one whose leaders talk about green energy, inequality and economic justice.”

In Allegheny County, Obama won 57 percent of the vote in 2012 – a result that contrasted strongly with his performance elsewhere in the southwestern region. In Washington County, Mitt Romney won 56 percent of the vote. In Greene County, Romney got 58 percent, in Fayette it was 54 percent, in Westmoreland it was 61 percent and in Beaver it was 53 percent.

Political observers agree that, for a variety of reasons (including his race) Obama has been a drag on downballot Democrats in western Pennsylvania. A big question is whether the Democrats’ potential presidential candidate in 2016 – Hillary Clinton – could win back some of the voters who defected to Obama’s opponents in 2008 and 2012.

Bolstered by the residual popularity of former President Bill Clinton and her center-right views, Clinton swamped Obama here in the 2008 Democratic primary. There’s broad agreement that she would improve upon Obama’s numbers locally if she runs, perhaps aiding downballot Democrats in the process.

“I know President Clinton is still hugely popular here,” Maggi said. “I do think Hillary Clinton could do well.” Her best shot at winning the region outright would be if the Republicans nominate a candidate too far to the right, Maggi and others said. “Most of us are middle-of-the-road here,” Maggi said.

But it will not be a slam dunk for Clinton, DiSarro added. “Voters will have to decide, ‘Do I vote for someone I really like and respect, or whose husband did a great job a number of years ago, or do I vote my interests?”

The result may hinge on whether losses up and down the ballot in 2014 shake Democratic officials in southwestern Pennsylvania out of their slumber, Holman said.

“The Democrats will have to do a better job of delivering their message, getting voters out and not simply assuming they can do things as they did 30 years ago,” he said. “The Democrats had become so complacent and had been running such formulaic campaigns that some forgot how to do it right.”

14 Responses

  1. As a middle aged white male who votes consistently for democrats, I know that I am in a minority. That is too bad, because so many of my peers only know one thing about politics and that is what they hear on the radio and Faux News. I have listened to many of them tell me things that simply are not true. Being an older white guy I can see some of the issues from a point of view that would indicate that they would be losing something. Problem is that a black guy, gay guy, women or any other newbie from the underclass is NOT our problem. The corporate over-lords love this. Look at what ha been proposed by either party, but particularly the Repugnants. They are against minimum wage laws. Against unionization. Against working family laws. Why would anyone who is not in the 1% would support those type of laws. I look at many of the Dummocrats who want to be Repugnant-lite and then lose elections. If the progressives run on real populist agendas (see Elizabeth Warren, and Bill Deblasio) they always win. Progressive ideas won in the last election even while poor conservative candidates were elected.
    I hope that the change against the corporatist rulers comes soon and WE the workers of the world united and win the WAR.

  2. Really enjoyed this story. I remember when the Southwest was solid Blue but the Reagan Democrat was born there and never has given back a mile of territory. There is plenty of blame to go around. The dying union influence and then the pathetic way they conducted business going forward. Corrupt Dem elected officials going to jail on the news many nights. But more importantly, a national agenda that forgot about Western Pennsylvanians along with their hopes and aspirations. They cared about others. Bob Casey can still garner their votes, but that is about where it ends.

  3. David Patti sums it up perfectly. The people in SW PA who vote grew up here, are over 60, and have seen too much change: a black in the White House, Ebola coming from Africa, blacks protesting and rioting in the streets; browns running over our borders; gays getting married; what next? All the above are “Democrat” caused;
    Realize also the great propaganda war being conducted by the drilling industry and the RNC, one can hear it every minute on KDKA; “the sky is falling”….from the talk show hosts, from the Republican politicians they interview, from the talk show callers; from the little “blurbs” they run in between their commercials “A whole Army of Democrats coming across the borders”…etc, etc, hearing it all day, and seeing it on TV ads at election time, drills into people’s minds that they should vote Republican in order to be safe and stem this liberalizing tide. Rednecks do listen to KDKA and watch TV. And they don’t care that much about pollution, cancer, bad water, (until it affects them).

  4. The people of SW PA are waking up to the true nature of the democrat party – for the Elite, not the middle class; champions of The State (federal, not Commonwealth), greater control over the lives of everyone under their thumb – and following their more mid-western sensibility rather than the SE PA madness.

  5. While canvassing in parts of Greene County in PA#9(Carmichaels, Greensboro Borough, & Bobtown)I spoke to quite a few voters on behalf of our Democratic candidate, Alanna Hartzok. Other than 1 youngish man I met at a Chevron frack pad, no one I spoke to was happy about the fracking business or coal, for that matter. They asked me where the fish were that once populated the Monongahela, they asked why some elected officials have become “millionaires,” they also said they had voted in the past for Republicans because they felt the Democrats were not working for them. Not being from the area, I did not know any of the elected officials they mentioned & maybe that is why they let loose with their feelings. People told me many elected Democrats are singing from the same song book as Republicans when it comes to the “war on coal.” I heard from UWUA workers that the closing of the Hatfield Ferry Plant was due to declining use of energy due to conservation (poor people turn down their thermostats), declining energy prices related to the use of natural gas to fire the plants, and the higher profits made by energy companies importing electricity from their more efficient, retro-fitted plants in WV (WV produces much more electricity than it uses with the more modern plants). It makes business sense for energy companies such as First Energy to close plants in PA where generation, transmission, & distribution taxes are higher than in WV.

    Democrats need better messaging to explain the reasons behind the loss of jobs in the coal mines. Many people I spoke to did not lament the loss of coal mining jobs as much as they lamented the loss of their “culture.” Some said liberal Democrats “look down on their culture.” Abortion and marriage equality never came up in my canvassing conversations. Voters talked about income inequality & their decreased standard of living related to what they perceived as an assault on the environment. Free, simple pleasures like fishing seemed impossible for them now.

  6. There have been Democrats in Westmoreland County keenly aware of the changing trends. I was one of the few candidates that could win four elections throughout period of change. But as the demographics changed, and voters that had historically voted Democrat passed on, they were replaced by a generation that for some reason still registers Democrat, but never votes that way. The 30,000 registration advantage in Westmoreland means every election is determined by Democrats (assuming both parties turn out is similar). What puzzles me is, if one votes Republican, and thinks like a Republican, why not register as one? In the past, the rationale seemed to be that to have influence in local primaries, one needed to be registered Democrat. But that isn’t the case as Republican control many municipal governments too.

  7. Really great analysis here; nice work on the article. A minor typographical note: Carnegie Mellon should not have a hyphen. 🙂

  8. D-Town R-

    There are cancer clusters all over PA (and the rest of the country) where fracking is occurring. Much of it goes unreported because the families settle with the companies under a non-disclosure agreement. But, here’s one case for you:

    Carl Stiles (deceased at age 46)
    Location: Bradford County, PA
    Gas Facility: Chesapeake gas wells
    Exposure: Water – strontium, uranium and radium
    Symptoms: Barium, arsenic, and VOCs (volatile organic chemicals) in blood, intestinal cancer, headaches, memory loss, and tremors

    Article with some more info.

  9. “Instead of exporting of our kids, our youth are staying here.”

    ….. and getting cancer from the fracking contamination.

  10. This is a great summary; I only object to race being used as a reason. The same comparison is used in describing West Virginia’s shift to the GOP. It completely ignores the impact of the President’s environmental policies which are literally putting several parts of the state out of business. Even areas that supported Obama in 2008 turned on him in 2012; did these voters become racists in the period in between, or can voters have a legitimate policy difference without being labeled a racist? Race is a factor, but how big? Are voters that cast ballotd for Ed Rendell over Lynn Swann in 2006 racist? No, there were genuine policy differences between the two. These trends in West Virginia have been moving since 2000 and in Southwestern Pennsylvania the trend goes back to the mid-90’s. Bill Clinton nearly lost Westmoreland County in 1996, and twenty years later Democrats want to sound the alarm bells. The other counties are simply following the trend that started in Westmoreland County. The trend will continue if a Democrat is elected President in 2016, who would likely pursue more liberal policies that are unpopular in the area. Had Mitt Romney won, Republicans would have had to take the brunt of midterm dissastisfaction. Obama’s election and re-election have only hastened the area’s rightward shift. Even Allegheny County’s presidential margins have been pretty flat the last 4 elections, while other urban counties have trended more and more blue.

  11. This is an excellent overview, props to the author. While there are definitely shifts here, one has to wonder how much the individual variables contributed. As noted by the article, Solobay and White had their own personal issues, which definitely contributed to their defeats (how much vs general pro-Republican sentiment is unclear at this point). I’m not sure you can attribute Rothfus’ cruise to victory to a serious shift, though, because the Dem candidate was never serious. You still have to raise and spend even with a registration advantage, and she failed at that miserably. She also alienated tons of support, so it’s not like there was a huge rally of support behind her and then defeat anyway. No one paid her much attention, so I don’t think there’s much to learn from her defeat. There was a lot more going on working against Dems than just attitude shifts in this area.

    If Dems can put up candidates without baggage in 2016, I think that will allow us to see just how far to the right these areas have shifted. This is also the last round of effects from the redistricting. It’s too soon to tell.

  • Does the NYC Verdict Make You More or Less Likely to Vote For Trump in 2024?

    • Less Likely (36%)
    • More Likely (34%)
    • Makes No Difference (30%)

    Total Voters: 112

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser


To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen