Wagner Goes Negative in Response Ad (With Video)


Firing back at his opponent, Jack Wagner launched his third ad of the Pittsburgh mayoral primary. It rebuts an earlier ad aired by opponent Bill Peduto and throws a jab back at him.

Peduto’s second ad cast Wagner as an ally of Republicans in Harrisburg.

Wagner ad re Peduto 2“Seen Bill Peduto’s negative ads? ‘Campaign dishonesty’ and ‘gross misrepresentations’ says the Tribune Review,” the narrtor in Wagner’s ad says.

“Republican Budget? Jack Wagner opposed cuts to essential services. Healthcare? Jack Wagner fought to restore funding. Pay raises? Jack Wagner rejected pay raises.”

It goes on to slam Peduto directly.

“Bill Peduto? A City Council colleague says Peduto ‘doesn’t work well with others’ and holds ‘petty grudges’. Bill Peduto: Dishonest. Divisive. Not a leader.”

The spot was produced by Philadelphia-based Bronstein & Weaver. It shows that even as weeks-old polls gave Wagner the lead, his campaign isn’t acting like an invulnerable frontrunner.

Peduto spokeswoman Sonya Toler fired back, saying Wagner can’t actually rebut the claims of Peduto’s ad.

“In his latest ad, Jack Wagner seeks to avoid the important issues in this race by running away from his own voting record and experience. Wagner has not disputed the facts raised in Bill Peduto’s latest comparative commercial,” she said.

Peduto is a City Councilman, Wagner served 8 years as Pa. Auditor General. State Rep. Jake Wheatley and activist AJ Richardson also are running in the Democratic primary.

Fact Check: Wagner 3, Peduto 1

Wagner a GOP ally?

Peduto’s that Wagner supported budget cuts by Harrisburg Republicans is false. While Wagner did support some of the principles that guided the GOP’s 2011 budget, he opposed several of the cuts they proposed.

Peduto’s ad cites a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review article from June 3 which emphasized two big issues on which Wagner agreed with state House Republicans.

He said Democrats in the legislature were wrong to try to spend a “surplus” on stop-gap spending items. Additionally, he said that the state should expect more savings from welfare programs.

However, unlike Peduto’s ad implies, Wagner did not advocate for cuts to social programs. In fact, a Pa. Public Radio report from the same day makes it clear that Wagner opposed the sweeping cuts proposed by the House GOP.

Peduto would have been on safer ground if he had said Wagner had helped Republicans. He publicly contradicted Democratic party talking points about the state budget in 2011 and gave political cover to the GOP. But as the ad is phrased, it is false.

Wagner wanted to cut health care?

The Peduto ad suggestion that Wagner wanted to cut health care for more than 100,000 people is false.

In 2011, Wagner said he supported a policy of robust audits for the Pa. Department of Public Welfare. The article cited by Peduto’s campaign makes clear that the 113,000 people thus removed from state medical assistance were, “people who died, moved out of Pennsylvania or were found ineligible for benefits”.

Wagner gave himself a pay raise?

Peduto’s ad is true, and certainly fair game for a campaign. Wagner voted for and accepted pay raises.

As a state Senator in 1995, Wagner voted to enact automatic pay raises of legislators like himself. In 2001 he voted for a bill that increased lawmaker pensions by 50% – just as Peduto’s ad claims.

After leaving the state Senate and becoming Auditor General, Wagner went on to criticize the automatic, cost-of-living raises, as his latest ad highlights. Additionally, he returned some of his raises during his second term as Auditor.

In its ad, the Peduto campaign cited a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review article. The Wagner ad cites the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Both articles are from the same day, about the same Wagner press conference. But only the Trib report makes note of the fact that Wagner himself voted to enact automatic pay raises for lawmakers.

Is Peduto Divisive?

Wagner’s ad says Peduto is divisive. Their source is subjective, but the ad accurately cites a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette report and demonstrates the value of a carefully-worded attack.

City Council President Darlene Harris herself briefly ran for Mayor, but dropped out and endorsed Wagner earlier this month.

She and Peduto have a history of acrimony and one could argue that her estimation of Peduto is imperfect. However, she did say those words, as Wagner’s ad reflects.

3 Responses

  1. Jack’s campaign is crashing as even the dumbest pundit could have predicted. He’s going to lose because he put together a terrible team and ran another ancient campaign as if it were still 1984.

  2. and the republican rag. tribune review come to the rescue of one of there own.maybe someone else name jack wagner voted for the pay raise give me a break.cant run from your record.

  3. ” ‘doesn’t work well with others’ and holds ‘petty grudges’ ” ???

    Sounds like someone holding a grudge. Meow. LOL 🙂

    Sounds like Wagner’s on much stronger ground with calling out Peduto’s lies/distortions on the important issues.

  • Who are you voting for in the PA Supreme Court race?

    • Dan McCaffery (61%)
    • Carolyn Carluccio (37%)
    • Still undecided (2%)

    Total Voters: 344

    Loading ... Loading ...
Continue to Browser


To install tap and choose
Add to Home Screen