Former PLCB Chairman Jonathan Newman Supports Turzai’s Privatization Efforts

By: Jared Edgerton, Contributing Writer

House Majority Leader Mike Turzai’s proposed legislation to privatize alcohol sales got a huge boost from former Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB) chairman Jonathan Newman, who threw his support behind it at a Tuesday morning press conference.

“The current system is antiquated – all anyone has to do is drive across the border to any of our neighboring states to see how out of touch the PLCB system is,” Newman said.  “There is no doubt in my mind that due to the inherent problems with the system, there is a desperate need to privatize.  Privatization will lead to greater convenience and better prices.  It is time to stop burdening Pennsylvanians with this backwater system that dates back to Prohibition.”

Newman’s seven-year tenure as PLCB chairman was highlighted by the introduction of the Chairman’s Selections, where Newman would negotiate to buy large quantities of a particular wine at low prices and pass the savings onto Keystone State imbibers. 

In early 2007, Newman stepped down after a dispute over the creation of the board’s CEO position, which then-Chairman Newman deemed unnecessary.  The former Wine Enthusiast Man of the Year now runs his own wine retail operation, Newman Wine & Spirits.

Other proponents of Turzai’s measure joined him at the press conference, including state Rep. Tom Killion, who argued that privatization would allow the PLCB to focus on regulation and education.  “This legislation responsibly moves Pennsylvania out of the alcohol business, while at the same time maintaining state revenues and ensuring greater enforcement of the Commonwealth’s liquor laws,” he said.

The measure, House Bill 11, would eliminate the eighteen percent Johnstown Flood tax and the thirty percent markup by the PLCB and replace it with a yet-to-be-determined tax per gallon (somewhere between 8 percent and 12.5 percent).  Turzai believes the per-gallon tax, along with a boost in sales due to better pricing, will offset any lost revenue.

During Turzai’s testimony before the House Liquor Control Committee last week, Democratic state Representative Dante Santon of Berks County disputed claims of revenue neutrality.

“You believe that, when it goes private, that we’ll get all those taxes, we won’t have to hire any new people at the Department of Revenue?” Santoni asked.  “Have you checked with the state treasurer or state attorney general to see what losses we might experience under that system?”

According to Turzai, the measure would also:

  • Help local and state police enforce liquor laws by providing concurrent jurisdiction.
  • Requiring retail managers and employees to attend Responsible Alcohol Management Program (RAMP) training
  • Mandate the use of ID scanners with age verification software
  • Require retail operations to be maintained in a separate area dedicated to the sale of liquor and all retail store employees to be at least 21 years old; and subjecting retail licensees to “age compliance checks” to ensure against selling to minors.  
  • Offer current PLCB employees the following opportunities: hiring preference in other state jobs; tax credits for employers to hire them full-time; and education grants to help retrain employees to perform other jobs.

August 2nd, 2011 | Posted in Features, Front Page Stories, Harrisburg | 2 Comments

2 thoughts on “Former PLCB Chairman Jonathan Newman Supports Turzai’s Privatization Efforts”

  1. Marie C says:

    You divest the asset because the Commonwealth should not be in the ‘business’ of selling alcohol. The PALCB is a political football. Look at Rendell rewarding crony Conti, creating a position that wasn’t needed or wanted.

  2. Gary Zarilla says:

    Privitization is utterly rediculous. Why would you sale an asset that is self supporting. You are talking about a separate entity of the government that pays for itself and makes a profit for the state. Look what happen when we did not listen to Jack Wagner (State Auditor)to sell the state building in Pittsburgh. Now we pay rent to the family who contributed to Gov. Rendell’s campaign. I believe some parts of government can be privitized. But, this is not one of them. Why don’t we give the state lottery back to private enterprise (like when I was a kid in the neighborhood.)

Comments are closed.